“…On the one hand, labor off-farm employment may F I G U R E 1 Distribution of the sample counties and villages reduce rural households' forest input, and the main reason is that labor off-farm employment would lead to fewer household laborers engaging in the forest management, rural households would choose forest land rent-out; on the other hand, labor off-farm employment may promote forest input, and the main reason is that the remittances from off-farm work may promote cash expenditure and the technological progress may make up for the labor constraint caused by labor off-farm employment. It is also found that rural households tend to invest their off-farm income in children's education, housing, and other durables, rather than agricultural production (Acharya & Leon-Gonzalez, 2014;De Brauw & Rozelle, 2008). Because of the comparatively lower economic returns from forestry, the income from off-farm work is more difficult to realize in forestry (Xie, Zhu, Cao, Kang, & Du, 2019).…”