2014
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2013.866224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do Migration and Remittances Affect Human Capital Investment? The Effects of Relaxing Information and Liquidity Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect on child labour is therefore ambiguous, especially in rural areas. Remittances can be used to purchase labour-saving equipment, possibly decreasing the reliance on child labour (Acharya & Leon-Gonzalez, 2014). Conversely, capital investments may require an increase in complementary inputs and notably in labour force recruited among family members.…”
Section: The Ambiguous Effect Of Remittancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effect on child labour is therefore ambiguous, especially in rural areas. Remittances can be used to purchase labour-saving equipment, possibly decreasing the reliance on child labour (Acharya & Leon-Gonzalez, 2014). Conversely, capital investments may require an increase in complementary inputs and notably in labour force recruited among family members.…”
Section: The Ambiguous Effect Of Remittancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the one hand, labor off-farm employment may F I G U R E 1 Distribution of the sample counties and villages reduce rural households' forest input, and the main reason is that labor off-farm employment would lead to fewer household laborers engaging in the forest management, rural households would choose forest land rent-out; on the other hand, labor off-farm employment may promote forest input, and the main reason is that the remittances from off-farm work may promote cash expenditure and the technological progress may make up for the labor constraint caused by labor off-farm employment. It is also found that rural households tend to invest their off-farm income in children's education, housing, and other durables, rather than agricultural production (Acharya & Leon-Gonzalez, 2014;De Brauw & Rozelle, 2008). Because of the comparatively lower economic returns from forestry, the income from off-farm work is more difficult to realize in forestry (Xie, Zhu, Cao, Kang, & Du, 2019).…”
Section: Methods 221 | Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() provided evidence that remittances lead to a net shift from public to private schooling among children from non‐poor and urban areas in the Equator. In a similar vein, using panel household survey data from Nepal, Acharya and Leon‐Gonzalez () reported that children in the secondary school stage living in remittance‐receiving households are 2.7 per cent more likely to study in a private school than children living in non‐remittances receiving households. The effect is greater among children with an educated mother, and in non‐poor, medium‐ and large landholding rural households.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%