2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do middle-aged and older adults with chronic hip pain view their health problem and its care? A protocol for a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

Abstract: IntroductionChronic hip pain in middle-aged and older adults is common and disabling. Patient-centred care of chronic hip pain requires a comprehensive understanding of how people with chronic hip pain view their health problem and its care. This paper outlines a protocol to synthesise qualitative evidence of middle-aged and older adults' views, beliefs, expectations and preferences about their chronic hip pain and its care.Methods and analysisWe will perform a qualitative evidence synthesis using a framework … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol for this systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42021246305) and was published. 47 This review was guided by recommendations made by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group, 53,90 the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative research (ENTREQ) checklist (see online supplementary appendix file 1, available at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B726). 86,116…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol for this systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42021246305) and was published. 47 This review was guided by recommendations made by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group, 53,90 the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative research (ENTREQ) checklist (see online supplementary appendix file 1, available at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B726). 86,116…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%