How Do Labor Market Institutions Influence the Preference to Work in Family Firms? A Multilevel Analysis Across 40 Countries

Abstract

Family firms must attract talented employees to stay competitive. They have different employer characteristics than nonfamily firms. For example, although they generally offer lower wages, they also typically offer higher job security and a more cooperative and entrepreneurial work environment. However, drawing on occupational choice theory, we argue that the importance of these unique family firm characteristics depends on the national labor market context in which the family firm is embedded. A multilevel investigation of 12,746 individuals in 40 countries shows that individuals prefer to work in family firms in labor markets with flexible unregulated hiring and firing practices, centralized wage determination, and low labor–employer cooperation. A cross-level analysis further shows that the national labor market context moderates the effects of individual-level factors determining the preference to work in a family firm (e.g., entrepreneurship intention). Our article is the first to consider labor market institutions in research on family firms as employers. Practical implications exist for family firms regarding their employer branding and intrapreneurship strategies.

When Can Families Fill Voids? Firms’ Reliance on Formal and Informal Institutions in R&D Decisions

“…Finally, to capture the firm’s home country tendency toward individualism vs collectivism, we use the 2007 version of the “individualism index” developed and annually updated by Hofstede Insights , thereby building on the renowned work of Hofstede (1991, 1980). This measure has been used in seminal studies in a plethora of management, economic, and organizational disciplines (Block et al, 2019; Oosterbeek et al, 2004), and ranges between 0 and 100, where values closer to 100 denote more individualist cultures, and values closer to 0 indicate more collectivist cultures. To enhance the interpretation of the results, we recoded the individualism index (100 – index score ) to reflect the country’s level of collectivism , including the latter in our analyses.…”

The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: A review and call for research

“…Researchers have also analyzed the impact of environmental factors on entrepreneurial cognition and behavior. These include: how institutional environment and political connections influence entrepreneurial investment (Ge et al 2017); how labor market institutions affect preference to work in family firms (Block et al 2018); and how institutional environments and poverty shapes the occupational identity of entrepreneurs (Shantz et al 2018). Scholars have also combined cognitive and behavior perspectives jointly in research.…”

Investors’ Reactions to CSR News in Family Versus Nonfamily Firms: A Study on Signal (In)credibility

“…This opens up the interesting research lacuna of determining which behaviors outside investors generally consider to be particularly legitimate and authentic for family firms beyond CSR. Prior research has revealed certain stereotypes regarding family firm behavior held by, for instance, job seekers (Block et al, 2019) or potential customers (Andreini et al, 2020). In addition, research has revealed that listed family firms tend to behave in a particularly conforming manner (Miller et al, 2013).…”