2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22207860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study

Abstract: One of the major challenges for autonomous vehicles (AVs) is how to drive in shared pedestrian environments. AVs cannot make their decisions and behaviour human-like or natural when they encounter pedestrians with different crossing intentions. The main reasons for this are the lack of natural driving data and the unclear rationale of the human-driven vehicle and pedestrian interaction. This paper aims to understand the underlying behaviour mechanisms using data of pedestrian–vehicle interactions from a natura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in Ref. [25] show that the vehicle deceleration behaviour is relative to the initial Time To Collision (TTC), subjective judgment of pedestrian crossing intention, vehicle speed, pedestrian position and crossing direction.…”
Section: Data-driven Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in Ref. [25] show that the vehicle deceleration behaviour is relative to the initial Time To Collision (TTC), subjective judgment of pedestrian crossing intention, vehicle speed, pedestrian position and crossing direction.…”
Section: Data-driven Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This objective can form another research study which analyzes pedestrian decisions that can be analyzed based on the gap acceptance of the pedestrians [8,28] or decision-making [6] and response time. Such data provides insight into the factors that need to be taken into account by an AV so that it can make an appropriate estimation on pedestrian crossing behaviour [18,26].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%