The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Global Audiences Take Shape? The Role of Institutions and Culture in Patterns of Web Use

Abstract: This study investigates the role of both cultural and technological factors in determining audience formation on a global scale. It integrates theories of media choice with theories of global cultural consumption and tests them by analyzing shared audience traffic between the world's 1,000 most popular websites. We find that language and geographic similarities are more powerful predictors of audience overlap than hyperlinks and genre similarity, highlighting the role of cultural structures in shaping global m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The eigenvector centrality of language [6] indicates that countries using more global languages (e.g., English) have greater cultural openness, consistent with the findings in previous studies ( b = .173, p < .05 for cultural betweenness; b = .190, p < .01 for cultural closeness) [7,8]. However, this effect largely disappears when cultural values are included in the model ( b = .092, p = .29 for cultural betweenness; b = .075, p = .18 for cultural closeness), indicating that cultural values are stronger predictors of cultural openness and capture most of the linguistic effect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eigenvector centrality of language [6] indicates that countries using more global languages (e.g., English) have greater cultural openness, consistent with the findings in previous studies ( b = .173, p < .05 for cultural betweenness; b = .190, p < .01 for cultural closeness) [7,8]. However, this effect largely disappears when cultural values are included in the model ( b = .092, p = .29 for cultural betweenness; b = .075, p = .18 for cultural closeness), indicating that cultural values are stronger predictors of cultural openness and capture most of the linguistic effect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As a consequence, English as a lingua franca allows greater access to cultural diversity [6,8], compared to local languages such as Korean or Japanese. Following Ronen et al’s [6] algorithm, we computed eigenvector centrality of a country’s language.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of approaching the question of audience fragmentation versus audience duplication across media platforms and across different media systems is through the audience‐centric approach developed by James Webster and his collaborators (Taneja, ; Taneja & Webster, ; Webster, ; Webster & Ksiazek, ; Weeks et al, ; Yuan & Ksiazek, ). According to this stream of work, audiences within media environments can be characterized by placing them on a spectrum that ranges from “fragmented” to “duplicated.” One determines this characterization by measuring the degree of audience “overlap” between each pair of outlets within the environment, which is simply the proportion of the population who use both.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods include shared website use for the most frequently visited websites, globally or nationally, using Alexa.com (http:// www.alexa.com/ ) rankings (Barnett and Park 2014;Taneja and Webster 2016).…”
Section: Is the Web Global?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method (using data from comScore) was used by Taneja and Webster (2016). Based on 2 million panellists from more than 170 countries, it is measured once per month, and includes the top 1,000 Web domains and subdomains that together account for 99 per cent of Web user visits.…”
Section: Is the Web Global?mentioning
confidence: 99%