How do general practice residents use social networking sites in asynchronous distance learning?

Abstract

BackgroundBlended learning environments - involving both face-to-face and remote interactions - make it easier to adapt learning programs to constraints such as residents’ location and low teacher-student ratio. Social networking sites (SNS) such as Facebook®, while not originally intended to be used as learning environments, may be adapted for the distance-learning part of training programs. The purpose of our study was to explore the use of SNS for asynchronous distance learning in a blended learning environment as well as its influence on learners’ face-to-face interactions.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study and carried out semi-structured interviews. We performed purposeful sampling for maximal variation to include eight general practice residents in 2nd and 3rd year training. A thematic analysis was performed.ResultsThe social integration of SNS facilitates the engagement of users in their learning tasks. This may also stimulate students’ interactions and group cohesion when members meet up in person.ConclusionsMost of the general practice residents who work in the blended learning environment we studied had a positive appraisal on their use of SNS. In particular, we report a positive impact on their engagement in learning and their participation in discussions during face-to-face instruction. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of SNS in blended learning environments and the appropriation of SNS by teachers.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0435-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Use of Social Network Sites for Communication Among Health Professionals: Systematic Review

“…This method is called “content analysis.” Researchers also analyzed the characteristics of SNS users and the context of their communications and SNSs metrics, such as the number of messages, posts, tweets, likes, and followers. Five studies conducted one-on-one interviews [ 24 , 37 , 39 , 41 , 46 ], and one used focus group interviews [ 44 ]. Thematic analysis was used in these studies, with key themes being identified from the content of the communications (eg, WhatsApp messages) and user comments.…”

“…The border between the professional and personal spheres of SNS use was blurred to many health professionals [ 39 ]. Exposure of one’s private life was one of the risks of using SNSs that contain detailed personal profile [ 22 , 29 ].…”

The use of virtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education: findings from an integrated review

“…Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn) 1 have been reported to provide an innovative and convenient way for users to communicate, establish and maintain connections with others based on their interests (Lofters, Slater, Nicholas Angl, & Leung, 2016). These network sites have become a popular choice for VCoPs due to their accessibility on multiple electronic devices allowing users to work more flexibly (Maisonneuve, Chambe, Lorenzo, & Pelaccia, 2015). It was been reported that most university students use social networking sites and have gained substantial skills in using themskills which can later be transferred to a professional setting (King et al, 2009).…”

“…In order for a virtual community to be successful, participants need to have a minimum level of technical competence regarding the use of ICTs (e.g. Maisonneuve et al, 2015). However, the learning curve needed for e-communication tools can be steep and obtaining a set of new technical skills requires time commitment from already busy health and social professionals (Lygidakis et al, 2016).…”

Engagement in Distance Education Settings: A Trend Analysis

“…For instance , Carpenter, Reddix and Martin (2016) have examined the effects of Web 2.0 tools usage in blended education on students' engagement and retention, and have reached positive results in terms of increasing engagement. Positive findings have also been reached in the studies using some specific Web 2.0 tools such as Wiki (Neumann & Hood, 2009;Snodgrass, 2011), Facebook (Maisonneuve, Chambe, Lorenzo, & Pelaccia, 2015;Northey et al, 2015), andpodcast-vodcast (van Oordt &Mulder, 2016).…”