How do firms upgrade innovation capabilities through the coevolution of post-merger integration and network reconstruction? A multiple-case study of Chinese companies

Abstract

Purpose Post-merger integration (PMI) is driven by coevolving processes. This paper examines the coevolution of dynamic integration strategy and network reconstruction and explores how these processes systematically enable emerging market acquirers to upgrade innovation capabilities.Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a multi-case study based on four Chinese overseas acquisitions of manufacturing firms. The data were collected from interviews and archival documentation.Findings This study develops a coevolutionary framework of dynamic integration strategy and network reconstruction to explain processes and mechanisms of an acquirer’s innovation capability upgrading. This framework identifies three network motivations, namely, network access, network connection and network synergy. Under different network motivations, dynamic transitions of the acquirer’s integration strategy coevolve with multi-level reconstruction of its networks. Collectively, they are important mechanisms driving innovation capability moves from imitation innovation to asportation and reimitation innovation and then to independent innovation.Originality/valueThis paper responds to a recent call for more insights into the dynamics of PMI and contributes to the research on emerging market multinational corporations’ post-acquisition integration. By integrating the M&A and networks literature, the paper provides evidence of unexplored mechanism of network changes during PMI. It reveals that how acquirers manage the dynamics of PMI to gradually achieve multi-level reconstruction of their networks. Based on a coevolutionary framework, the paper provides a process perspective on how the coevolution of PMI and network reconstruction promotes the upgrading of innovation capabilities.

Distinctive Competencies and Process of Innovation During Organizationals Merger : The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Vacuum

“…In particular, it can be seen from the measurement model that if research actors can well define each step of innovation process (PI2) and able to commercialize the innovations (PI6), then these can lead to the emergence of solid competencies to smoothen the innovation process during organizational change due to merger. Several past studies revealed that to meet organizational goals during merger, main actors of R&D should be able to take agile actions, especially in knowledge spill-over and prompt commercialization (Bolívar-Ramos et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2022;Fernandez et al, 2018b;Real et al, 2006;Taghizadeh et al, 2020;van Lieshout et al, 2021).…”

Resuming business operations after a Hiatus: The case of reappearing relationships

“…But, as our case study shows, during the re-noding, not only the new counterparts, but also the prior counterparts bring new knowledge to the business network that is developed. Although previous studies have shown that network reconstruction promotes the upgrading of innovation capabilities (Chen, Wang, & Zhu, 2022), the aspects of re-noding and its consequences for network reconstruction when resuming business operations represent an area of research that fills a void in the existing business network dynamics literature.…”