2018
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Financing Constraints Affect Firms’ Equity Volatility?

Abstract: Theory suggests that financing frictions can have significant implications for equity volatility by shaping firms’ exposure to economic risks. This paper provides evidence that an important determinant of higher equity volatility among research and development (R&D)‐intensive firms is fewer financing constraints on firms’ ability to access growth options. I provide evidence for this effect by studying how persistent shocks to the value of firms’ tangible assets (real estate) affect their subsequent equity vola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High financing costs would reduce managers' ability to undertake profitable projects as far as the investment decisions are not independent of financing strategies in imperfect markets (Deari and Deari, 2010;Rahaman, 2011). Therefore, financing constraints (FC) reduce investment (Hubbard, 2001;Almeida and Campello, 2007;Carvalho, 2018;Alm et al, 2019), which, in turn, leads to the under-investment problem (Verdi, 2006;Islam and Luo, 2018;Li et al, 2019). As a result, FC in extreme circumstances may drive firms into financial distress and bankruptcy point (Gordon, 1971;Farooq, 2015;Sheikh and Qureshi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High financing costs would reduce managers' ability to undertake profitable projects as far as the investment decisions are not independent of financing strategies in imperfect markets (Deari and Deari, 2010;Rahaman, 2011). Therefore, financing constraints (FC) reduce investment (Hubbard, 2001;Almeida and Campello, 2007;Carvalho, 2018;Alm et al, 2019), which, in turn, leads to the under-investment problem (Verdi, 2006;Islam and Luo, 2018;Li et al, 2019). As a result, FC in extreme circumstances may drive firms into financial distress and bankruptcy point (Gordon, 1971;Farooq, 2015;Sheikh and Qureshi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Li (2011), we measure asset tangibility ( TANGIBLE ) as 0.715 ×receivables +0.547 ×inventories +0.535 ×fixed capital, where we scale all the factors by total assets net of cash. Asset tangibility has a negative effect on capital allocation inefficiency as asset tangibility gives firms more borrowing capacity and, thus, such firms face low financial constraints for investing in positive net present value projects (Carvalho, 2018). We estimate financial slack ( SLACK ) as cash and marketable securities scaled by total assets (Bhandari and Javakhadze, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, firms with no financial support from banks or other sources tend to look for supplier credit (although the potential of obtaining such credit may vary subject to erratic movement in product prices, provided the firm assets are used as collateral). Carvalho (2018) illustrates a theoretical framework in which he argues that a firm's investment decisions depend on how much collateral they have and that when the value of collateral increases, financing constraints are relaxed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%