2020
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Expectations about the Macroeconomy Affect Personal Expectations and Behavior?

Abstract: Using a representative online panel from the US, we examine how individuals' macroeconomic expectations causally affect their personal economic prospects and their behavior. To exogenously vary respondents' expectations, we provide them with different professional forecasts about the likelihood of a recession. Respondents update their macroeconomic outlook in response to the forecasts, extrapolate to expectations about their personal economic circumstances and adjust their consumption plans and stock purchases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
121
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
9
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the immediate learning rate was similar in Experiment 2 on MTurk, this implies a recall rate of about one third after four weeks. This magnitude is in line with the persistence of updating documented by previous literature in the context of macroeconomic expectations (Armantier et al, 2016;Coibion et al, 2018;Fuster et al, 2019;Roth and Wohlfart, 2019), which we summarize in Table A.20 in the online appendix. Columns 2-4 of Table A.18 show that our estimated learning rate is robust to the specification used e.g.…”
Section: Empirical Specificationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Assuming that the immediate learning rate was similar in Experiment 2 on MTurk, this implies a recall rate of about one third after four weeks. This magnitude is in line with the persistence of updating documented by previous literature in the context of macroeconomic expectations (Armantier et al, 2016;Coibion et al, 2018;Fuster et al, 2019;Roth and Wohlfart, 2019), which we summarize in Table A.20 in the online appendix. Columns 2-4 of Table A.18 show that our estimated learning rate is robust to the specification used e.g.…”
Section: Empirical Specificationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…3 Part of this literature provides indirect evidence on voters' concerns about government debt. On the one hand, reducing government debt could be punished by voters because of its contractionary effect Giuliano and Spilimbergo, 2014;Roth and Wohlfart, 2018;Weinzierl, 2017). 3 Battaglini et al (2018) provide evidence from a laboratory experiment which studies political distortions in the accumulation of public debt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They only survey elderly populations, they are run every two years, which makes studying the process of updating expectations over time difficult, and they only include questions about individual expectations such as retirement age and longevity. Observing macroeconomic expectations is crucial to understanding whether any effects of limited cognition might 1 See also Landier, Ma, and Thesmar (2018), , Gennaioli, Ma, and Shleifer (2018), Armantier, Bruine de Bruin, Topa, Klaauw, and Zafar (2015), Crump, Eusepi, Tambalotti, and Topa (2018), Bachmann, Berg, and Sims (2015), Glaeser and Nathanson (2017), Fuster, Perez-Truglia, Wiederholt, and Zafar (2018), Malmendier and Nagel (2016), Roth and Wohlfart (2018), D 'Acunto, Hoang, and Weber (2019), Das, Kuhnen, and Nagel (2017), D 'Acunto, Malmendier, Ospina, and Weber (2019), D 'Acunto, Malmendier, and Weber (2019), Fuster, Kaplan, and Zafar (2018), Andre, Pizzinelli, Roth, and Wohlfart (2019), Vellekoop and Wiederholt (2017), and Ben-David, Fermand, Kuhnen, and Li (2018). matter for aggregate outcomes and for the effectiveness of policies that operate through managing such expectations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%