How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure

Abstract

IntroductionDisciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear.MethodsAll doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents’ characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated.ResultsRespondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with ‘defensive medicine’, such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients’ wishes (35%).ConclusionThe Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.

‘We're gonna end up scared to do anything’: A qualitative exploration of how client complaints are experienced by UK veterinary practitioners

“…Although involuntary in nature, there are mental health implications for those affected and further reaching effects through resultant changed behaviours 15 . Defensive practice, which directly threatens patient safety, is one such extensively reported consequence among doctors subjected to emotionally challenging complaints and associated investigations 16–19 . Defined as ‘unnecessary and meaningless actions driven by external demands instead of a focus on the patient's problem’, 20 defensive practice manifests as over‐ or under treatment; patients’ exposure to risk is increased through superfluous medications and surgeries, or conversely, diagnoses may be delayed or even missed 21,22 …”

How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review

“…The studies were published during 1972–2021. Among those, the 50 European studies included in this systematic review2 3 5–8 16–20 22–25 34–68 were published during 1995–2020 with a steep increase in publications during the recent years (table 1, figure 2).…”

Medical disciplinary jurisprudence in alleged malpractice in radiology: 10-year Dutch experience

“…However, the impact of the disciplinary process and the measures itself should not be underestimated. Alleged healthcare professionals describe feelings of misery and insecurity both during the process as in its aftermath, and they fear receiving new complaints and provide care more cautiously after the imposed measure [28,29]. This in turn may lead to defensive medicine, which is an important contributor to healthcare costs without adding any benefit to patients [30][31][32][33].…”