How do different types and characteristics of green space impact mental health? A scoping review

Abstract

Green space matters for mental health but is under constant pressure in an increasingly urbanising world. Often there is little space available in cities for green areas, so it is vital to optimise the design and usage of these available green spaces. To achieve this, experts in planning, design and nature conservation need to know which types and characteristics of green spaces are most beneficial for residents' mental health. A scoping review of studies that compare different green space types and characteristics on mental health was conducted. A total of 215 (experimental, observational and qualitative) papers were included in the scoping review. This review highlights a high level of heterogeneity in study design, geographical locations, mental health outcomes and green space measures. Few of the included studies were specifically designed to enable direct comparisons between green space types and characteristics (e.g. between parks and forests). The included studies have predominantly experimental research designs looking at the effects of short‐term exposure to green space on short‐term mental health outcomes (e.g. affect and physiological stress). More studies enabled only indirect comparisons, either within the same study or between different studies. Analysis of the direction of the mental health outcomes (positive, neutral, negative) from exposure to various types and characteristics of green space found positive (i.e. beneficial) effects across all green space types. However, green space characteristics did appear to render more diverse effects on mental health, which is especially the case for vegetation characteristics (e.g. higher vegetation density can be negative for mental health). The scoping review reveals gaps in the present evidence base, with a specific need for more studies directly comparing green space types and characteristics within the same study. Proposed future research directions include the use of longitudinal research designs focusing on green space characteristics, considering actual exposure and systematically addressing heterogeneity in factors influencing the relation between green spaces and mental health (e.g. type of interaction, user experience). Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Solution to what? Global assessment of nature-based solutions, urban challenges, and outcomes

“…While we recorded comparisons to other NbS types, further synthesis was hindered by the use of multiple heterogeneous NbS comparators without specifying outcomes for each, as also noted by Dick et al (2020). A recent review provided a possible approach to generalize the comparative results by focusing on specific pairs of NbS types, such as forest and park (Beute et al, 2023). Their results were mixed due to heterogeneity in NbS characteristics and research design.…”

Exploring the social and cultural values of trees and woodlands in England: A new composite measure

“…O' Brien and Forster (2023), in an evaluation of the Active Forests Programme, found that one of the ways in which people valued being recreationally active in a forest environment was because of the beauty and variety of those landscapes. The health and well-being benefits of treescapes have also been highlighted in many studies (Beute et al, 2020;Tyrväinen et al, 2019), although further research is needed to understand more about the characteristics of treescapes that have the most impact on health. Spiritual, symbolic and sensory values related to forests have been identified as being important to a diverse range of people (Church et al, 2014;Cloke & Jones, 2002;Kenter et al, 2014;O'Brien et al, 2012.…”

Health Effects of Participation in Creating Urban Green Spaces—A Systematic Review

“…However, a distinction needs to be made between exposure to and active participation in green spaces, also referred to as experiencing green spaces [16]. These experiential aspects of participation in green spaces may be very relevant to their health effects, yet they have been studied less often, as a recent scoping review on the mental health impacts of various green space types and characteristics concludes [27]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews of the effects of participation in the creation of urban green spaces on health.…”