2015
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?

Abstract: none.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CLBRs for the conservative and optimal estimates (51% and 72%) after six complete cycles reported by Malizia et al from a large center in Boston were lower than these in our study (64.34% and 83.40%) [2]. Comparing with the conservative and optimal estimates of CLBRs after six complete cycles in the UK (43.90% and 75.50%) and Belgium (54.10% and 76.30), corresponding gures from our research were slightly higher [5,17]. We speculate that the higher CLBRs in our study is related with our treatment protocol-freeze all strategy, which has been reported that could increase pregnancy rate and live birth rate by avoiding the potential deleterious effects of controlled ovarian stimulation on the endometrium.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CLBRs for the conservative and optimal estimates (51% and 72%) after six complete cycles reported by Malizia et al from a large center in Boston were lower than these in our study (64.34% and 83.40%) [2]. Comparing with the conservative and optimal estimates of CLBRs after six complete cycles in the UK (43.90% and 75.50%) and Belgium (54.10% and 76.30), corresponding gures from our research were slightly higher [5,17]. We speculate that the higher CLBRs in our study is related with our treatment protocol-freeze all strategy, which has been reported that could increase pregnancy rate and live birth rate by avoiding the potential deleterious effects of controlled ovarian stimulation on the endometrium.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…A prospective study conducting among 156947 UK women between 2003 and 2010 showed six cycles achieved CLBRs of 78.0% and 46.8% for the optimal and conservative estimates, respectively [4]. A retrospective study included 12869 patients who were registered in the Belgian national assisted reproductive technology (ART) registry between 2009 and 2011 revealed the optimal and conservative estimates of CLBRs after six cycles were 76.3% and 54.1% [5]. However, these studies were all about conventional IVF strategy, the CLBRs following freeze-all strategy has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chance is affected by a range of treatment‐related and individual factors. If there are embryos available for freezing after a stimulated cycle this increases the chance of having a baby because they can be transferred one by one in subsequent cycles if there is no pregnancy . Almost half of the embryo transfers undertaken in Australia and New Zealand in 2014 were of thawed embryos .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid these, almost all embryo transfers (83%) performed in Australia and New Zealand in 2014 were single embryo transfers . For those who do not achieve a live birth in their first stimulated cycle, each additional cycle they undergo, at least up to six cycles, increases the chance of this happening . Of the individual factors that influence chance of success, the woman's age is the most significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of our strict policy of single embryo transfer (sET) multiple pregnancy rate in our series was low and completely comparable to the corresponding fi gure aft er NR. It was demonstrated that the sET policy resulted in a signifi cant reduction in the multiple pregnancy rate from 24% to 12% in Belgium [22] without a negative impact on the cumulative pregnancy rate [23,24].…”
Section: One Of the Sources Of Perinatal Complications (Especiallymentioning
confidence: 99%