Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do crows and parrots come to spontaneously perceive relations-between-relations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with data on the high level of brain development and cognitive abilities of corvids ( Smirnova et al, 2015 , 2021 ; Emery and Clayton, 2016 ; Güntürkün and Bugnyar, 2016 ; Güntürkün et al, 2017 ). It is important to note that other aspects of consciousness have been previously revealed in them: the capacity to infer mental states in others ( Emery and Clayton, 2001 , 2016 ; Bugnyar and Heinrich, 2005 ; Dally et al, 2006 , 2010 ; Schloegl et al, 2009 ; von Bayern and Emery, 2009 ; Bugnyar et al, 2016 ; Ostojić et al, 2016 , 2017 ), the capacity for self-recognition ( Prior et al, 2008 ; Clary and Kelly, 2016 ; Buniyaadi et al, 2019 ), episodic-like memory for past events ( Clayton and Dickinson, 1998 ; Clayton et al, 2003 ; Clayton and Emery, 2015 ), and episodic-like planning of future events ( Raby et al, 2007 ; Cheke and Clayton, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are consistent with data on the high level of brain development and cognitive abilities of corvids ( Smirnova et al, 2015 , 2021 ; Emery and Clayton, 2016 ; Güntürkün and Bugnyar, 2016 ; Güntürkün et al, 2017 ). It is important to note that other aspects of consciousness have been previously revealed in them: the capacity to infer mental states in others ( Emery and Clayton, 2001 , 2016 ; Bugnyar and Heinrich, 2005 ; Dally et al, 2006 , 2010 ; Schloegl et al, 2009 ; von Bayern and Emery, 2009 ; Bugnyar et al, 2016 ; Ostojić et al, 2016 , 2017 ), the capacity for self-recognition ( Prior et al, 2008 ; Clary and Kelly, 2016 ; Buniyaadi et al, 2019 ), episodic-like memory for past events ( Clayton and Dickinson, 1998 ; Clayton et al, 2003 ; Clayton and Emery, 2015 ), and episodic-like planning of future events ( Raby et al, 2007 ; Cheke and Clayton, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of numerous independent studies using different experimental approaches show that corvids achieve cognitive feats that are comparable to those exhibited by primates ( Smirnova et al, 2015 , 2021 ; Emery, 2016 ; Güntürkün and Bugnyar, 2016 ; Güntürkün et al, 2017 ). Corvids’ remarkable cognitive abilities are based on the high level of their brain complexity ( Emery, 2016 ; Olkowicz et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Each participant completed eight trials of one MTS training task: Identity MTS (Experiment 3A), Color MTS (Experiment 3B), Number MTS (Experiment 3C), or Size MTS (Experiment 3D; see Figure 4) followed by the OMTSvRMTS test task of Experiment 2. While the bases of matching were similar between our MTS tasks and those used by Smirnova et al (2015; i.e., identity, color, or number, size), the stimuli in Experiment 3 differed in many respects from the MTS tasks used by Smirnova et al (2015; see Appendix and Smirnova et al, in press; for detailed descriptions of the stimuli in the respective paradigms). These differences, however, do not affect the hypothesis being tested in Experiment 3—namely that training on simple MTS tasks can increase relational responding on a subsequent RMTS in a population that demonstrably already has abstract representations same and different sufficient for supporting RMTS…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Third, training may have taught birds the logic of matching tasks—that is, that the correct basis of matching is one on which the correct choice card matches the sample and differs from the other choice card—once again focusing them on a search for perfect matches, which in RMTS occur only on the relations same and different. See Smirnova et al (in press) for a convincing argument that this is at least part of the explanation for the success of their training regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation