2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do cross-country differences in institutional trust and trust in family explain the mixed performance effects of family management? A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An enhanced understanding is required of the family and scholarly calls to acknowledge families as ‘intimate relationship systems’ and the impact of this on actions and activities by family members (Jennings et al. , 2014; Jaskiewicz et al. , 2021; Cruz and Basco, 2018; Rezaei et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An enhanced understanding is required of the family and scholarly calls to acknowledge families as ‘intimate relationship systems’ and the impact of this on actions and activities by family members (Jennings et al. , 2014; Jaskiewicz et al. , 2021; Cruz and Basco, 2018; Rezaei et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, analyzing the performance of equivalent companies run under family or non-family management, respectively, could highlight the relevance of family management in differing contexts. While there already exists a large literature on the performance of family-managed firms (Fang et al, 2022;Jaskiewicz et al, 2021), we know less about contextual influences. Our theoretical model and numerical examples suggest that the performance differences should be larger when economic and non-economic goals are highly interdependent.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on their evaluation, ones who violate social expectations might be sanctioned (e.g., product boycotts, loss of government contacts and subsidies, or withdrawal of community support) (Jaskiewicz et al, 2021;Reast et al, 2013).…”
Section: Neo-institutional Theory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%