2013
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do comprehensive and acute stroke units differ? A critical review

Abstract: Background: Stroke unit care is advocated for all acute stroke patients. Varying models of stroke unit care exist and there is a need to identify how these models differ and how these differences may affect patient outcomes. This review explores the difference between the comprehensive stroke unit model, which includes rehabilitation, and the acute stroke unit model, which does not. Content: A review of descriptive information regarding comprehensive and acute stroke units was performed to determine the differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with what would be expected in a rehabilitation model of care. These results support our recent review of ASU and CSU care, in which we found that the ASU model tends to focus primarily on acute medical care, while a stronger emphasis on multidisciplinary rehabilitation appears to exist in the CSU model even in the acute stage of stroke [10]. The greater emphasis on multidisciplinary rehabilitation in the CSU may promote the increased early physical activity found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding is consistent with what would be expected in a rehabilitation model of care. These results support our recent review of ASU and CSU care, in which we found that the ASU model tends to focus primarily on acute medical care, while a stronger emphasis on multidisciplinary rehabilitation appears to exist in the CSU model even in the acute stage of stroke [10]. The greater emphasis on multidisciplinary rehabilitation in the CSU may promote the increased early physical activity found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…53 Age, cognition, functional level after stroke, and to a lesser extent continence have shown consistent associations with poststroke outcomes, and stroke severity is associated with acute discharge disposition, final discharge disposition, and functional level. 54 In recent years, lengths of stay in IRFs have decreased significantly, but in survivors with mild to moderate stroke, patient satisfaction does not appear to be diminished, and recovery actually may be faster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Early physical activity has been described as a key component of the CSU model of care [4, 13]. In a review of the literature describing the ASU and CSU models of care we found an emphasis on acute medical management, increased nurse staffing, early assessment and investigation, and intensive physiological monitoring in ASU care models [14]. In contrast, CSU care tended to have a greater emphasis on multidisciplinary teamwork and involvement in rehabilitation, active participation of the patient and family, and early mobilisation policies [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of the literature describing the ASU and CSU models of care we found an emphasis on acute medical management, increased nurse staffing, early assessment and investigation, and intensive physiological monitoring in ASU care models [14]. In contrast, CSU care tended to have a greater emphasis on multidisciplinary teamwork and involvement in rehabilitation, active participation of the patient and family, and early mobilisation policies [14]. These underlying features of the CSU may facilitate increased physical activity early after stroke compared to alternative models of acute stroke care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%