2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/acii52823.2021.9597426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How diverse is the ACII community? Analysing gender, geographical and business diversity of Affective Computing research

Abstract: ACII is the premier international forum for presenting the latest research on affective computing. In this work, we monitor, quantify and reflect on the diversity in ACII conference across time by computing a set of indexes. We measure diversity in terms of gender, geographic location and academia vs research centres vs industry, and consider three different actors: authors, keynote speakers and organizers. Results raise awareness on the limited diversity in the field, in all studied facets, and compared to ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of community members analysed varies among studies, although conference (keynote) speakers are the most common -and sometimes unique-target [13], [14], [16], [20]. Speakers have undoubtedly a key role in shaping the external prestige of a conference, but other actors such as PC members, authors and attendees are equally important when it comes to effectively evaluate diversity, as covered in few works [15], [18], [23] as well as in our previous study on ACII [11]. Interestingly, diversity among journal actors (authors, editorial boards) and societies/associations members is under-studied, especially in the AI field.…”
Section: Towards a More Comprehensive Monitoring Of Diversity: New Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The type of community members analysed varies among studies, although conference (keynote) speakers are the most common -and sometimes unique-target [13], [14], [16], [20]. Speakers have undoubtedly a key role in shaping the external prestige of a conference, but other actors such as PC members, authors and attendees are equally important when it comes to effectively evaluate diversity, as covered in few works [15], [18], [23] as well as in our previous study on ACII [11]. Interestingly, diversity among journal actors (authors, editorial boards) and societies/associations members is under-studied, especially in the AI field.…”
Section: Towards a More Comprehensive Monitoring Of Diversity: New Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…women, black people, other minority groups), institutions and countries. Our previous work presented in ACII 2021 [11] is, to the best of our knowledge, the first attempt to quantify diversity in the Affective Computing community. It computes four diversity indexes for each ACII conference edition from 2005 to 2019, following the same methodology as the AI Watch Index 2021 report [23], [24], and comparing them to those of top-tier AI conferences.…”
Section: Diversity Studies In Affective Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pielou and Shannon in- dexes are computed for each of the three community member roles, and then averaged as indicated in Figure 2 to obtain four diversity indicators: Gender Diversity Index (GDI), Business Diversity Index (BDI), Geographic Diversity Index (GeoDI) and the overall Conference Diversity Index (CDI). For further information about how DivinAI indexes are computed, we refer the reader to (Freire, Porcaro, and Gómez 2021;Hupont et al 2021).…”
Section: Diversity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%