Abstract:District Health Management Teams (DHMTs) are often entry points for the implementation of health interventions. Insight into decision-making and power relationships at district level could assist DHMTs to make better use of their decision space. This study explored how district-level health system decision-making is shaped by power dynamics in different decentralised contexts in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda. In-depth interviews took place with national-and district-level stakeholders. To unravel how power dynamics… Show more
“…Thus, although executive management roles were shifted from the Ministry of Health, the shift was to the district councils and not necessary to the district hospitals or their managers (Bulthuis et al , 2021). It was further interesting to note that in the current set-up, district hospitals have been “stripped” some organisational features that they used to have in the pre-decentralisation era.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the actors' view about the reforms is in terms of mere devolution mirroring the instruments underlying them. This is problematic because experience shows that devolution on its own is not complete as it does not automatically result in the devolved entities and their managers enjoying greater autonomy; often the opposite is achieved (Barasa et al , 2017; Bulthuis et al , 2021). True to the experience, the results show that instead of the hospitals being progressively reformed towards greater autonomy, they are being reduced in organisational status they possessed in the pre-decentralisation era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience shows that where blank devolution is insisted, implementation of best practice models, in the light of the public sector reforms championed by New Public Management, produces unhealthy systemic friction among the actors within the public sector hierarchy (Athanasiadis et al , 2018; Sumah and Baatiema, 2019). Otherwise the devolved entities either remain the same, as they were within the central government structure or get deformed through loss of some pre-reforms autonomy, which negatively affects the morale of staff and overall productivity (Barasa et al , 2017; Bulthuis et al , 2021).…”
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of governance reforms also called conceptual innovation for public hospitals in Malawi.Design/methodology/approachIt focuses on the reforms for central and district hospitals. It uses semi-structured interviews to collect data and thematic approach to analyse it.FindingsThe results show that the reforms for central hospitals are structurally well characterised as aimed at corporatisation though they are termed as automatisation. The terminological seems not to pose any harm on the direction of the reforms due to the thorough structural characterisation. On the other hand, reforms for district hospitals are vague as such implementation is retrogressive, in that, instead of progressively moving the hospitals towards greater autonomy the opposite is happening.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the significance of characterisation of the intended outcome on the direction of the reforms and proposes a framework to guide conceptual innovation for public hospitals in a devolution-mediated environment.
“…Thus, although executive management roles were shifted from the Ministry of Health, the shift was to the district councils and not necessary to the district hospitals or their managers (Bulthuis et al , 2021). It was further interesting to note that in the current set-up, district hospitals have been “stripped” some organisational features that they used to have in the pre-decentralisation era.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the actors' view about the reforms is in terms of mere devolution mirroring the instruments underlying them. This is problematic because experience shows that devolution on its own is not complete as it does not automatically result in the devolved entities and their managers enjoying greater autonomy; often the opposite is achieved (Barasa et al , 2017; Bulthuis et al , 2021). True to the experience, the results show that instead of the hospitals being progressively reformed towards greater autonomy, they are being reduced in organisational status they possessed in the pre-decentralisation era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience shows that where blank devolution is insisted, implementation of best practice models, in the light of the public sector reforms championed by New Public Management, produces unhealthy systemic friction among the actors within the public sector hierarchy (Athanasiadis et al , 2018; Sumah and Baatiema, 2019). Otherwise the devolved entities either remain the same, as they were within the central government structure or get deformed through loss of some pre-reforms autonomy, which negatively affects the morale of staff and overall productivity (Barasa et al , 2017; Bulthuis et al , 2021).…”
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of governance reforms also called conceptual innovation for public hospitals in Malawi.Design/methodology/approachIt focuses on the reforms for central and district hospitals. It uses semi-structured interviews to collect data and thematic approach to analyse it.FindingsThe results show that the reforms for central hospitals are structurally well characterised as aimed at corporatisation though they are termed as automatisation. The terminological seems not to pose any harm on the direction of the reforms due to the thorough structural characterisation. On the other hand, reforms for district hospitals are vague as such implementation is retrogressive, in that, instead of progressively moving the hospitals towards greater autonomy the opposite is happening.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the significance of characterisation of the intended outcome on the direction of the reforms and proposes a framework to guide conceptual innovation for public hospitals in a devolution-mediated environment.
“…Although there is an accumulating evidence base on the notion of decision space in district health systems, in general ( Bossert and Mitchell, 2011 ; Liwanag and Wyss, 2018 ; Henriksson et al. , 2019 ; Bulthuis et al. , 2021 ), and around Human Resources for Health in particular ( Alonso-Garbayo et al.…”
Although increasing public spending on health worker (HW) recruitments could reduce workforce shortages in sub-Saharan Africa, effective strategies for achieving this are still unclear. We aimed to understand the process of transitioning HWs from President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to Government of Uganda (GoU) payrolls and to explore the facilitators and barriers encountered in increasing domestic financial responsibility for absorbing this expanded workforce. We conducted a multiple case study of 10 (out of 87) districts in Uganda which received PEPFAR support between 2013 and 2015 to expand their health workforce. We purposively selected eight districts with the highest absorption rates (‘high absorbers’) and two with the lowest absorption rates (‘low absorbers’). A total of 66 interviews were conducted with high-level officials in three Ministries of Finance, Health and Public Service (n = 14), representatives of PEPFAR-implementing organizations (n = 16), district health teams (n = 15) and facility managers (n = 22). Twelve focus groups were conducted with 87 HWs absorbed on GoU payrolls. We utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to guide thematic analysis. At the sub-national level, facilitators of transition in ‘high absorber’ districts were identified as the presence of transition ‘champions’, prioritizing HWs in district wage bill commitments, host facilities providing ‘bridge financing’ to transition workforce during salary delays and receiving donor technical support in district wage bill analysis—attributes that were absent in ‘low absorber’ districts. At the national level, multi-sectoral engagements (incorporating the influential Ministry of Finance), developing a joint transition road map, aligning with GoU salary scales and recruitment processes emerged as facilitators of the transition process. Our case studies offer implementation research lessons on effective donor transition and insights into pragmatic strategies for increasing public spending on expanding the health workforce in a low-income setting.
“…As donors like PEPFAR reduce their nancial support to workforce costs, little is known about which factors hinder or facilitate the expansion of scal space for health worker recruitments within the Government. These data are critical to understanding the dynamics involved, and strategies needed for increasing domestic nancial Although there is an accumulating evidence base on the notion of decision space in district health systems, in general (Bossert and Mitchell 2011;Henrikson et al 2016;Liwanag et al 2018;Bulthuis et al 2020), and around Human Resources for Health in particular (Alonso-Garbayo et al 2017; Sumah and Baetia 2019), there is little empirical attention to the prospect of creating scal space for expanding the health workforce in decentralized settings in low-income countries. We aimed to understand the process of health worker transition from PEPFAR to Uganda Government payrolls and to explore the facilitators and barriers encountered in increasing domestic nancial responsibility for this transition.…”
Although expanding fiscal space for health worker recruitments could reduce workforce shortages in Sub-Saharan Africa, effective strategies for achieving this are still unclear. We aimed to understand the process of transitioning health workers (HWs) from PEPFAR to Government of Uganda (GoU) payrolls and to explore the facilitators and barriers encountered in increasing domestic financial responsibility for absorbing this transitioned workforce. We conducted a multiple case-study of 10 (out of 87) districts in Uganda which received PEPFAR support between 2013 and 2015 to expand their health workforce. We purposively selected eight districts with the highest absorption rates (‘High absorbers’) and two with the lowest absorption rates (‘Low absorbers’). A total of 66 interviews were conducted with high-level officials in three Ministries of Finance, Health and Public Service (n = 14), representatives of PEPFAR implementing organizations (n = 16), District Health Teams (n = 15) and facility managers (n = 22). Twelve focus groups were conducted with 87 HWs absorbed on GoU payrolls. We utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide thematic analysis. At sub-national level, facilitators of transition in ‘high absorber’ districts were identified as the presence of transition ‘champions’, prioritizing HWs in district wage bill commitments, host facilities providing ‘bridge financing’ to transition workforce during salary delays and receiving donor technical support in district wage bill analysis- attributes which were absent in ‘low absorber’ districts. At national-level, multi-sectoral engagements (incorporating the influential Ministry of Finance), developing a joint transition road map, aligning with GoU salary scales and recruitment processes emerged as facilitators of the transition process. Overall, PEPFAR support acted as a catalyst for increasing GoU and facility-level budget allocations towards expanding the health workforce in focus districts in Uganda. Our case-studies offer implementation research lessons on effective donor transition and insights into pragmatic strategies for expanding fiscal space for health in a low-income setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.