How different are hospitals’ responses to a financial reform? The impact on efficiency of activity-based financing

Abstract

For policy-makers the heterogeneity of hospital response to reforms is of crucial concern. Even though a reform may entail a positive effect on average efficiency, policy-makers will consider the reform as less attractive if the variation in hospital efficiency increases. The reason is that increased variance of efficiency across hospitals is likely to increase the impact of geography on access to hospital services. This paper examines the heterogeneity with respect to the impact of a financial reform-Activity Based Financing (ABF)-on hospital efficiency in Norway. From a theoretical model we find an ambiguous effect of hospital heterogeneity on the effect of ABF on efficiency. The data set is from a contiguous 10-year panel of 47 hospitals covering both pre-ABF years and years after its imposition. Substantial heterogeneity in the responses, as measured by both estimated and predicted coefficients, is found. We did not find any significant correlation between pre-ABF measures of efficiency and the effect of ABF on efficiency. We did however find a strongly significant correlation between the effect of ABF and post-ABF efficiency. Thus, the analysis confirms the impression that, whereas pre-ABF efficiency did not play any role in how hospitals responded to ABF, those responding generally ended up as better-performing hospitals. Hence, for the type of reform studied in this article we find that policy-makers do not need to worry about the impact of location on patients' access to hospital services.

The effect of activity-based financing on hospital length of stay for elderly patients suffering from heart diseases in Norway

“…Chalkley and Malcomson already delineated a theoretical understanding of changes in the financing system for non-profit hospitals [13,14], and Biørn et al adapted this theory to the Norwegian setting [15,16]. These models often assume a trade-off between efficiency and quality in hospital production that can be shifted by various reimbursement systems.…”

Productivity growth, case mix and optimal size of hospitals. A 16-year study of the Norwegian hospital sector

“…The method has been used at different levels: comparing nations [20], regions [21] but more commonly hospitals. In Norway and the Nordic countries there are numerous examples of DEA used for estimating hospital productivity [9,11,17,[22][23][24][25][26][27]. The method is favoured in environments where substantial measurement errors are unlikely and with multiple inputs and/or outputs [7,28,29].…”

Determinants of Hospital Efficiency: insights from the literature

“…The introduction of DRG-based prospective payment system was often found to have negative effects on hospitals' length of stay and positive effects on efficiency [56]. A number of studies conducted in the US and Europe indicate that the introduction of DRGs resulted in a positive shift in efficiency [57][58][59][60].…”