2006
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Did Social Medicine Evolve, and Where Is It Heading?

Abstract: A better understanding of how social medicine evolved, says Porter, could help to focus its role in responding to the health needs of a post-industrial, globalizing world.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This interdisciplinary approach is the province of social medicine, the sub-field of medicine that studies and engages with social aspects of health, illness, and care (Henderson et al, 2005;Porter, 2006). As such, social medicine can be defined by four primary characteristics: multidisciplinary methodologies, roots in social theory, critically interpretive stance, and proclivity to engage with social aspects of clinical and scientific problems.…”
Section: Consortium Of Universities For Global Health Noted Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interdisciplinary approach is the province of social medicine, the sub-field of medicine that studies and engages with social aspects of health, illness, and care (Henderson et al, 2005;Porter, 2006). As such, social medicine can be defined by four primary characteristics: multidisciplinary methodologies, roots in social theory, critically interpretive stance, and proclivity to engage with social aspects of clinical and scientific problems.…”
Section: Consortium Of Universities For Global Health Noted Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomedical model, perhaps more attuned to the focus on individualism in Western societies, to the belief in 'hard' science and to the interests of the medical profession, dominated health policy in the second half of the twentieth century (Porter, 2006). Huge sums were invested in hospital building and biomedical research programs, specialties multiplied, and medical practice became increasingly narrow and technological.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One theory credits medicine's increasing focus early in the twentieth century on treating the biological causes of disease, and public health's contrasting occupation with the social and environmental causes of illness, resulting in efforts geared toward health promotion and prevention (Khoury et al 2007). The vectors of medicine and public health diverged further when schools of medicine and public health in the United States were officially separated in 1916 (Khoury et al 2007), in part due to the conflicting goals of professionals in the fields (Porter 2006). Additional ideas include ''the rise of medical authority with the expansion of hospital-based specialist practices'' (Porter 2006) as well as a corresponding split between individualist and collectivist modes of analysis in the social sciences (Arah 2009).…”
Section: Challenges For Public Health and Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%