2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11598-006-9010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Did Domestication Change the Hair Morphology in Sheep and Goats?

Abstract: We analysed macro-and microscopic features of dorsal guard hairs in 21 specimens of wild and domestic sheep and goats. We integrated and extended the available data on hair morphology of wild species and provide a first comparative analysis of hair structure of domestic forms. Domestic sheep and goats, probably due to a convergence process under artificial selection, show similar medullary features to each other and different medullary structures from their relative wild relatives. Different breeds show a dive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…GH1 hairs are usually straight and stiff while GH2 hairs are bent at the juncture of shaft and shield (Teerink, 1991). Two main structural components, the cuticular scale patterns and the medullar patterns are studied in detail for __________________________________________ *Corresponding author's email: suyamam@pdn.ac.lk distinguishing species (Fernandez and Rossi, 1998;Mayer et al, 2000;Marinis and Asprea, 2006b). In addition, cross-sections, length and maximal diameter of hair, and hair profile are used in distinguishing species (Teerink, 1991;Cavia, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GH1 hairs are usually straight and stiff while GH2 hairs are bent at the juncture of shaft and shield (Teerink, 1991). Two main structural components, the cuticular scale patterns and the medullar patterns are studied in detail for __________________________________________ *Corresponding author's email: suyamam@pdn.ac.lk distinguishing species (Fernandez and Rossi, 1998;Mayer et al, 2000;Marinis and Asprea, 2006b). In addition, cross-sections, length and maximal diameter of hair, and hair profile are used in distinguishing species (Teerink, 1991;Cavia, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Finnish Landrace goat, with its coarse, double-coated fleece, was, and still is, mainly bred for milk production. Despite these two different forms of goat husbandry, however, domestic goats show no clear differences from their wild relatives in cuticle structure; artificial selection has not focused principally on the quality of the goat hair (De Marinis & Asprea 2006a & b). Even without bioarchaeological analysis, however, we can confidently state that the morphology of the best-preserved, fine, intermediate and guard hair fragments from the Perttulanmäki grave most closely match those of domesticated goat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figuur 21 Een gevulde medulla met polygonale cellen bij de moeflon maakt plaats voor een multiseriate medulla bij het schaap. Uit De Marinis & Asprea (2006b). Figuur ) uitwerpselen verzameld van mei 2018 tot en met november 2020, en uitgedrukt in absolute aantallen (n), procentuele verdeling (%) en frequentie van voorkomen (%FO).…”
Section: Figuurunclassified
“…22 Cuticulapatroon schaap ter hoogte van de schede (links) en het schild (rechts) uit DeMarinis & Asprea (2006b). Figuur 23 Links: intermediaire mozaïek cuticula ter hoogte van de schede bij Kempens heideschaap.…”
unclassified