2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/819/2/161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Dense Is Your Gas? On the Recoverability of LVG Model Parameters

Abstract: We explore the recoverability of gas physical conditions with the Large Velocity Gradient (LVG) model, using the public code RADEX and the molecules HCN and CO. Examining a wide parameter range with a series of models of increasing complexity, we use both grid and Monte Carlo Markov Chain methods to recover the input conditions, and quantify the inherent and noise-induced uncertainties in the model results. We find that even with the benefit of generous assumptions, the LVG models struggle to recover any param… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excitation conditions of a multi-phase, multiple gas component ISM are also expected to change for each galaxy. One would expect that the density and kinetic temperature of the CO (1 − 0) emitting gas (and the gradients across the galaxy) to factor into the total attenuation of the CO (1−0) line emission (Tunnard & Greve 2016 and any selfshielding. As the intense star-forming conditions during the redshifts indicated in these three samples (SPT, H-ATLAS, Planck-Herschel) will give rise to a dynamic set of ISM conditions, these varying gas excitation conditions will therefore have non-negligible effects in the observed LIR-to-L CO(1−0) values.…”
Section: Ratio Of Ir Luminosity To Co Line Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation conditions of a multi-phase, multiple gas component ISM are also expected to change for each galaxy. One would expect that the density and kinetic temperature of the CO (1 − 0) emitting gas (and the gradients across the galaxy) to factor into the total attenuation of the CO (1−0) line emission (Tunnard & Greve 2016 and any selfshielding. As the intense star-forming conditions during the redshifts indicated in these three samples (SPT, H-ATLAS, Planck-Herschel) will give rise to a dynamic set of ISM conditions, these varying gas excitation conditions will therefore have non-negligible effects in the observed LIR-to-L CO(1−0) values.…”
Section: Ratio Of Ir Luminosity To Co Line Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular one could use tables, such as those presented in this study, to determine a priori whether similar line intensities arise from very different physical conditions and viceversa. This may be of particular importance in light of the results from Tunnard & Greve (2016) who find that LVG models struggle to recover any parameter better than to within half a dex and they find no evidence of systemic offsets. While these Tables are not exhaustive we hope that they can be used to track the origin of multiple solutions.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Calculations: Intensities and Intensitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, the CMB background against which the line is measured increases too. This twofold effect shifts the peak of the CO SLED at higher transitions up to J up ∼ 6 − 7 (Tunnard & Greve 2016;Vallini et al 2018). Mid-J CO observations can be therefore used in the early Universe for investigating the molecular gas reservoir and ISM properties in both star-forming (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%