2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How deep does a remote sensor sense? Expression of chlorophyll content in a maize canopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vincini et al (2015) discussed that experimental datasets can be affected by experimental error, due for example to imperfect sampling. It corresponds with the study of Ciganda et al (2012). Those authors determined the number of leaf layers sensed by red-edge chlorophyll index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Vincini et al (2015) discussed that experimental datasets can be affected by experimental error, due for example to imperfect sampling. It corresponds with the study of Ciganda et al (2012). Those authors determined the number of leaf layers sensed by red-edge chlorophyll index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This optimal spectral range is positioned more than 60 nm away from the position of in situ red absorption band of Chl. In this spectral region, the absorption coefficient of Chl is very low ( Lichtenthaler, 1987), however, light penetration inside the leaf and canopy is much deeper than in the red and shortwave red-edge region (Ciganda et al, 2012;Merzlyak and Gitelson, 1995). Thus, absorption by the canopy around 740 nm (i.e., product of light pathway and absorption coefficient) is enough to provide high sensitivity of reflectance to Chl content.…”
Section: Total Canopy Chl and N Contents Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HA was held over an individual row maintaining a nearly constant height FOV of the crop canopy. The AA platform, operated manually via a handheld radio controller (RC), was clearly the most variable platform for height and field of view control (FOV).The AP method integrates soil as well as crop canopy reflectance, while the active sensor methods, located directly over plant rows, do not capture soil reflectance (Ciganda et al 2012).…”
Section: Maize Canopy Study 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%