The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ef001160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Daily Temperature and Precipitation Distributions Evolve With Global Surface Temperature.

Abstract: The climate is an aggregate of the mean and variability of a range of meteorological variables, notably temperature (T) and precipitation (P). While the impacts of an increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST) are commonly quantified through changes in regional means and extreme value distributions, a concurrent shift in the shapes of the distributions of daily T and P is arguably equally important. Here, we employ a 30-member ensemble of coupled climate model simulations (CESM1 LENS) to consistently q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether variability changes matter for impacts needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis. For example, changes in daily temperature variability can have a disproportionate effect on the tails and thus extreme events (Samset et al, 2019). However, there is a clear need to better validate model internal variability, as we found models to differ considerably in their magnitude of internal variability (consistent with Maher et al, 2020, andSchlunegger et al, 2020), a topic that has so far received less attention (Deser et al, 2018;Simpson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Whether variability changes matter for impacts needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis. For example, changes in daily temperature variability can have a disproportionate effect on the tails and thus extreme events (Samset et al, 2019). However, there is a clear need to better validate model internal variability, as we found models to differ considerably in their magnitude of internal variability (consistent with Maher et al, 2020, andSchlunegger et al, 2020), a topic that has so far received less attention (Deser et al, 2018;Simpson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Building on methodology developed by Samset et al (2019), we quantify the PDFs of daily mean and maximum near-surface (2-meter) air temperature (SAT and SAT max ), precipitation (precip), minimum daily surface relative humidity (RH min ), and surface wind speed (wind). While other climatic and weather-related factors, such as soil moisture and snow, also influence wildfire regimes, we focus on the variables that pose the most direct risk factors and form the basis for the Canadian forest fire weather index (see below), which we use as an aggregate measure of the change in wildfire risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important source of uncertainty not explicitly addressable within the CMIP context is parameter uncertainty. Even within a single model structure, some response uncertainty can result from varying model parameters in a perturbed-physics ensemble (Murphy et al, 2004;Sanderson et al, 2008). Such parameter uncertainty is sampled inherently but non-systematically through a set of different models, such as CMIP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%