2018
DOI: 10.1509/jmr.14.0653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Customer Referral Programs Turn Social Capital into Economic Capital

Abstract: Customers acquired through a referral program have been observed to exhibit higher margins and lower churn than customers acquired through other means. Theory suggests two likely mechanisms for this phenomenon: (1) better matching between referred customers and the firm and (2) social enrichment by the referrer. The present study is the first to provide evidence of these two mechanisms in a customer referral program. Consistent with the theory that better matching affects contribution margins, (1) referrer–ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow Hollebeek (2011, p. 555) and define engagement as a “customer’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral activities.” More specifically, our focus is on indirect customer engagement, which includes incentivized referrals, social media conversations about products/brands, and customer feedback to companies (Pansari and Kumar 2017). These types of actions contribute to a firm’s revenue, as referred customers are typically more profitable than those not referred (Palmatier, Kumar, and Harmeling 2017; Van den Bulte et al 2018). This impact of engagement on profitability has also received empirical verification across business-to-business (Kumar, Petersen, and Leone 2010) and business-to-consumer (Lee and Grewal 2004) contexts, and its benefits can derive from both cost reduction and revenue enhancement (Harmeling et al 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow Hollebeek (2011, p. 555) and define engagement as a “customer’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral activities.” More specifically, our focus is on indirect customer engagement, which includes incentivized referrals, social media conversations about products/brands, and customer feedback to companies (Pansari and Kumar 2017). These types of actions contribute to a firm’s revenue, as referred customers are typically more profitable than those not referred (Palmatier, Kumar, and Harmeling 2017; Van den Bulte et al 2018). This impact of engagement on profitability has also received empirical verification across business-to-business (Kumar, Petersen, and Leone 2010) and business-to-consumer (Lee and Grewal 2004) contexts, and its benefits can derive from both cost reduction and revenue enhancement (Harmeling et al 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A customer who has a continued long-term relationship with a brand because of these external factors faces cognitive discomfort because of the feeling of entrapment with the brand and will need economic incentive (Hennig-Thurau et al, 2004) to compensate for their perceived losses incurred in the long term (Hansen et al, 2003). These customers refer the brand to others in their network to turn their social capital into economic capital (Van den Bulte et al, 2018). Thus, monetary benefits provided by the firm act as the reward that externally motivates customers to reduce the dissonance caused because of their sacrifices (Harrison-Walker, 2001).…”
Section: Continuance Commitment and Customer Referral Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, social red packets are relevant to referral rewards (e.g., Garnefeld et al 2013;Ryu and Feick 2007;Van den Bulte et al 2018): Both are promotional rewards for referring peer purchases. However, these two promotional rewards differ in the following aspects: (1) In social red packets, referrals are not limited to new customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%