2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.04212
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Curiosity can be modeled for a Clickbait Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspect that the task of distinguishing between clickbait and non-clickbait headlines is related to pull quote extraction because both tasks may rely on identifying the catchiness of a span of text. In (Venneti and Alam, 2018), the authors found that measures of topic novelty (estimated using LDA) and surprise (based on word bigram frequency) were strong features for detecting clickbait. A set of 215 features were considered in (Potthast et al, 2016) including sentiment, length statistics, and many features based on specialized dictionary-based word occurrences, but the authors found that the most successful features were character and word n-grams.…”
Section: Clickbait Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suspect that the task of distinguishing between clickbait and non-clickbait headlines is related to pull quote extraction because both tasks may rely on identifying the catchiness of a span of text. In (Venneti and Alam, 2018), the authors found that measures of topic novelty (estimated using LDA) and surprise (based on word bigram frequency) were strong features for detecting clickbait. A set of 215 features were considered in (Potthast et al, 2016) including sentiment, length statistics, and many features based on specialized dictionary-based word occurrences, but the authors found that the most successful features were character and word n-grams.…”
Section: Clickbait Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem in this work of automatically selecting PQs is distinct from, but related to previously studied problems of headline success prediction (Piotrkowicz et al, 2017;Lamprinidis et al, 2018), clickbait identification (Potthast et al, 2016;Chakraborty et al, 2016;Venneti and Alam, 2018), as well as key phrase extraction (Hasan and Ng, 2014) and document summarization (Nenkova and McKeown, 2012). In the context of convincing a reader to engage in a text, the title tells the reader what the article is about and sets the tone, clickbait makes (often unwarranted) lofty promises of what the article is about, and key phrases and summaries indicate whether the topic or constituent components are of interest to the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study found that human curiosity takes part in detecting clickbait, such with high curiosity, people are more likely to get trapped on clickbait news. The connection between curiosity and clickbait persisted on all age [8]. Indonesian is mostly curious people, the high engagement on celebrity related news and overly friendly Indonesian culture, which often followed by overly curious question (or kepo), one of the examples ISSN: 2252-8938  is how Indonesian really like to dig into other's private lives, such as asking why a couple still haven't had kids or so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%