Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3197091.3197092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How CS academics view student engagement

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to build an HMM, we utilize the manifest features for student performance, challenge, endurance, and attendance gap. We pick the manifest features by performing an extensive thematic analysis [84,116] across the literature about student engagement [43,50,73]. The features we use are as follows.…”
Section: Students' Engagement Moods (Rq1) 61 Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to build an HMM, we utilize the manifest features for student performance, challenge, endurance, and attendance gap. We pick the manifest features by performing an extensive thematic analysis [84,116] across the literature about student engagement [43,50,73]. The features we use are as follows.…”
Section: Students' Engagement Moods (Rq1) 61 Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in Computer Science there are several ongoing discussions on how academics view the concept of engagement (e.g. [12,13]), and how students' engagement in computer science classes can be improved [14]. This is even more important when we are dealing with first year students in introductory Computer Science modules [15,16].…”
Section: Students' Engagement In Muvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem and project-based learning, inverted classroom, peer instruction, games, and gamification, are some of those methodological alternatives. Common to all of them is the need for greater student engagement, moving from passive to active participation, allowing them to become the protagonists of the(ir) learning process [5] [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%