2020
DOI: 10.1561/100.00018188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Cross-Cutting Discussion Shapes Support for Ethnic Politics: Evidence from an Experiment in Lebanon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One-shot public goods games are common in the literature, see, for instance, Ledyard (1995); Fischbacher, Gächter, and Fehr (2001); Chaudhuri (2016). This script refers to engaging in a discussion because the public goods game was played as part of the baseline data collection for the discussion experiment studied in Paler, Marshall, and Atallah (2020). We note that we had the moderator reveal the group composition because traits like sect and class are not necessarily readily apparent in Lebanon such that participants otherwise might have only inferred their group type with substantial noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-shot public goods games are common in the literature, see, for instance, Ledyard (1995); Fischbacher, Gächter, and Fehr (2001); Chaudhuri (2016). This script refers to engaging in a discussion because the public goods game was played as part of the baseline data collection for the discussion experiment studied in Paler, Marshall, and Atallah (2020). We note that we had the moderator reveal the group composition because traits like sect and class are not necessarily readily apparent in Lebanon such that participants otherwise might have only inferred their group type with substantial noise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major questions emerging from this literature is whether these interventions shift knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, or all three. Some prior research finds changes in behaviors but not attitudes ( 10 , 12 ), while other research finds changes in knowledge but not behaviors ( 11 ). One difference between these interventions is whether the peacebuilding elements of the program were explicit or implicit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact-based interventions in the lab and in the field generally change attitudes and/or behaviors of individuals who directly participate in contact interventions ( 7 , 8 ), even among groups with deep-seated conflicts ( 9 12 ). Yet it is unclear whether and how these interventions affect the wider community involved in conflict.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention of ethnic political parties in social and political life facilitates ethnic political socialization. These explanations underscore the importance of ethnic political party intervention in the development of stable partisan and political attitudes and the public displays of loyalty they engender (Paler et al, 2018(Paler et al, , 2020. But to date, empirical research has not fully uncovered the way in which these interventions are complements or substitutes for existing "agents" of political socialization.…”
Section: Ethnic Political Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%