1992
DOI: 10.1257/jep.6.3.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Costly is Protectionism?

Abstract: How costly is protectionism? This paper begins from a U.S. perspective, examining the costs to both the U.S. and other countries from U.S. protectionism. It emphasizes that substantial costs are imposed on foreign countries by U.S. protectionism. These costs result from the highly selective nature of protection in particular industries and against particular exporting countries. No discussion of the costs of protection would be complete without mentioning the increasing levels of investment by foreign firms wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the numerous cases where large countries are imposing such quantitative trade barriers, there are also terms of trade effects to consider (as there are also with a tariff). They can lead to efficiency losses for the exporting countries that more than offset the quota rent transfer --as found in several of the US studies of VERs surveyed by Feenstra (1992). They also lead to extra losses (a) if the quotas are volume based because that measure encourages the exporting of more-processed or higher -quality products within the product group for each quota, (b) if the quotas are allocated (rather than auctione d) but not to the lowest-cost exporting countries, (c) if the licences to fill an exporting country's quota are allocated (rather than auctioned) but not to the lowest-cost firms in that country, (d) if the quota leads to additional lobbying, in this case for an allocation of the quota, that erodes the rent transfer, and (e) if the VER encourages inefficient foreign direct investment (FDI) in the importing country in lieu of exporting the product to that country, or FDI in another (highercost) exporting country.…”
Section: Measuring the Cost Of Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerous cases where large countries are imposing such quantitative trade barriers, there are also terms of trade effects to consider (as there are also with a tariff). They can lead to efficiency losses for the exporting countries that more than offset the quota rent transfer --as found in several of the US studies of VERs surveyed by Feenstra (1992). They also lead to extra losses (a) if the quotas are volume based because that measure encourages the exporting of more-processed or higher -quality products within the product group for each quota, (b) if the quotas are allocated (rather than auctione d) but not to the lowest-cost exporting countries, (c) if the licences to fill an exporting country's quota are allocated (rather than auctioned) but not to the lowest-cost firms in that country, (d) if the quota leads to additional lobbying, in this case for an allocation of the quota, that erodes the rent transfer, and (e) if the VER encourages inefficient foreign direct investment (FDI) in the importing country in lieu of exporting the product to that country, or FDI in another (highercost) exporting country.…”
Section: Measuring the Cost Of Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 A first attempt was made by Feenstra (1992). He shows in a numerical example how trade barriers can affect the number of available products and reduce consumer welfare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He shows in a numerical example how trade barriers can affect the number of available products and reduce consumer welfare. Following the idea of Feenstra (1992), Romer (1994) calibrates a model with fixed export costs and finds that a substantial reduction in trade barriers will lead to more exported varieties, resulting in an increase of GDP of up to 20%. Using a similar approach Klenow and Rodríguez-Clare (1997) construct and calibrate a general equilibrium model with detailed Costa Rican trade data to quantify the impact of trade restrictions on welfare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of these gains has been realized by authors like Harris (1984), Feenstra (1992) or Romer (1994), but the most influential work regarding the empirics in this field is found in Feenstra (1994b). In his seminal contribution, 1 I would like to note here that other authors have quantified the value of new varieties using domestic micro data: Examples are Hausman (1997aHausman ( , 1997bHausman ( , and 1999 or Petrin (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%