How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Described in Keywords: An Analysis of 144 CSR Definitions Across Seven Decades

Abstract

This article reports a longitudinal analysis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) keywords drawing on an extensive sample of 144 CSR definitions across seven decades. There are clear differences in the keywords used in various time periods to describe the person or entity providing CSR, the CSR activity provided, and the intended recipients or targets of any CSR activities. There has been a trend away from individuals such as managers or specific groups such as employees being identified as providers or recipients of CSR towards keywords describing CSR as an organizational responsibility that is provided to large and inclusive groups such as communities or abstract entities such as stakeholders or the environment. Since the millennium, there has been considerable convergence in CSR keywords that appears to be driven by the availability of CSR information via the internet. The changes in CSR keywords appear to parallel changes in societal expectations, regulation and legislation, and the wider business environment. This suggests that corporations deploy CSR defensively to express alignment with prevailing public priorities, stress compliance with government directives and emphasise conformity with corporate contemporaries. The implications of these findings are discussed and possible lines for future research are proposed.

The Credit Risk of Sustainable Firms during the Pandemic

“…Our study highlights another important attribute of firm sustainability, which is often considered an abstract concept (Homer & Gill, 2022). In fact, in line with other studies that support the idea that firm sustainability is an essential firm-specific factor to ensure firm resilience (Albuquerque et al, 2020;Cardillo et al, 2022), our study confirms that sustainability becomes a concrete strategic and operational business lever not only to maintain sustainability during bear market conditions, but also to increase firm elasticity (or sensitivity) to public policies.…”

Measuring corporate citizenship and public image: evidence from scale development and validation

“…Past research writings on corporate social responsibility (i.e. an umbrella term) (Homer and Gill, 2022) in general and, in particular, the literature on corporate citizenship asked: Why do certain companies “appear good” while others do not (Belay et al , 2023)? Can companies be supposed to be like “real citizens” (Logsdon and Wood, 2002)?…”

The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development Practices on Employer Branding—A Case Study of an International Corporation Operating in Poland

“…Činčalová and Prokop [9] analyzed 100 definitions and found that social responsibility is based on volunteering, stakeholders, and the integration of individual pillars in Carroll's pyramid of CSR: economic, social, environmental, legal, philanthropic, and ethical [9,11]. Homer and Gill [12] examined how CSR is described in keywords by analyzing 144 definitions across seven decades. Their study revealed a shift away from providers or recipients of CSR, defined as individuals such as managers or specific groups such as employees, towards keywords describing CSR as an organizational responsibility that is provided to large groups such as communities, stakeholders, or the environment.…”