2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08080-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How context alters value: The brain’s valuation and affective regulation system link price cues to experienced taste pleasantness

Abstract: Informational cues such as the price of a wine can trigger expectations about its taste quality and thereby modulate the sensory experience on a reported and neural level. Yet it is unclear how the brain translates such expectations into sensory pleasantness. We used a whole-brain multilevel mediation approach with healthy participants who tasted identical wines cued with different prices while their brains were scanned using fMRI. We found that the brain’s valuation system (BVS) in concert with the anterior p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the reward circuit, neuroscientists have suggested that top-down signals regulate activity in reward structures such that value signals are either made to conform to, or contrast with, the frame information (De Martino, Camerer & Adolphs, 2010;Schmidt et al, 2017;Tymula & Plassmann, 2016), an idea that chimes with the observation that people are more or less susceptible to framing, with people less prone seen to recruit increased regulatory activity in the executive network (Aydogan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Hedonic Values Are Not (Only) Object Derivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the reward circuit, neuroscientists have suggested that top-down signals regulate activity in reward structures such that value signals are either made to conform to, or contrast with, the frame information (De Martino, Camerer & Adolphs, 2010;Schmidt et al, 2017;Tymula & Plassmann, 2016), an idea that chimes with the observation that people are more or less susceptible to framing, with people less prone seen to recruit increased regulatory activity in the executive network (Aydogan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Hedonic Values Are Not (Only) Object Derivedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While caution is warranted in interpreting a null effect, it is possible that the effects on experience related primarily to affective processes. Indeed, when wines are labeled as expensive as opposed to cheap, neural regions related to affective value (e.g., vmPFC and ventral striatum) mediate an effect of price on perceived pleasantness (Schmidt, Skvortsova, Kullen, Weber, & Plassmann, 2017). It is possible that the "pleasantness" measure in our study most directly addressed this affective component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is not imagined, as the brain will construct an actual experience of reality based on the priming. The experiment has recently been redone (Schmidt et al 2017…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expectations related to experiences change how they are perceived across a variety of sensory domains, including pain (Schmidt et al 2017), vision (Summerfield and De Lange 2014), smell (De Araujo et al 2005), and hearing (Kirk et al 2009). While it seems astounding that expectations shape the way we taste, see, hear, and smell, the finding that pain is also under the influence of our mind's expectations appears preposterous.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%