2014
DOI: 10.1177/0275074013520563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Competitive Is “Competitive” Procurement in the Social Services?

Abstract: The scholarship on contracting generally argues that markets for social services are weak and lacking in competition. Using data gathered from Florida's largest social service agency, the Department of Children and Families, this article adds to the discussion by constructing a more rigorous measure of competition that accounts for the quality of bidding entities. The findings indicate that while the measures used in earlier studies align reasonably well with the raw number of initial responders to competitive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a growing literature on markets for public services concludes that they are weak and lacking competition (Van Slyke ; Girth et al ; Hefetz and Warner ; Johnston and Girth ; Lamothe ). Considering that a key assumption underlying the concept of a properly functioning market is a requirement for many buyers and sellers, ‘thin’ markets with few vendors are unlikely to produce a level of competition that fosters quality improvement and cost reduction (Johnston and Girth ).…”
Section: Theoretical Argument: Outsourcing Bureaucratic Personnel Qumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a growing literature on markets for public services concludes that they are weak and lacking competition (Van Slyke ; Girth et al ; Hefetz and Warner ; Johnston and Girth ; Lamothe ). Considering that a key assumption underlying the concept of a properly functioning market is a requirement for many buyers and sellers, ‘thin’ markets with few vendors are unlikely to produce a level of competition that fosters quality improvement and cost reduction (Johnston and Girth ).…”
Section: Theoretical Argument: Outsourcing Bureaucratic Personnel Qumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have explored the various skills, resources and competences of policy capacity, including the following: (i) organisational capacity to encourage potential social service providers to compete for government contracts; (ii) managerial capacity to evaluate proposals and select vendors, and to negotiate, monitor and enforce contracts; and (iii) political capacity to maintain strongly accountable partnerships with social service providers (Brown and Potoski, ; Brown et al, ; Cooper, ; Jing and Savas, ; Kettl, ; Lamothe and Lamothe, ; Lamothe, ; Sclar, ).…”
Section: Theorising Policy Design and Capacity For Contracting Outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Steuerle et al (2017) estimated that the U.S. nonprofit sector received approximately US$497 billion from the federal government in fiscal year (FY) 2015 for service delivery, which was 187% higher than in FY 1980. This close funding relationship has attracted significant attention from public and nonprofit management scholars (e.g., Amirkhanyan & Lambright, 2017; Brown et al, 2018; Lamothe, 2015; Salamon & Toepler, 2015; Suárez & Esparza, 2017). In this body of government–nonprofit relations literature, a growing number of studies explore what factors affect government’s source selection or, framed differently, what type of nonprofits are more preferred by funding agencies (e.g., Garrow, 2010; Lu, 2015; Marwell & Gullickson, 2013; Stone et al, 2001; Suárez, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%