How competent are non-specialists trained to integrate mental health services in primary care? Global health perspectives from Uganda, Liberia, and Nepal

Abstract

Evaluations to objectively assess minimum competency are not routinely implemented for training and supervision in global mental health. Addressing this gap in competency assessment is crucial for safe and effective mental health service integration in primary care. To explore competency, we describe a training and supervision program for 206 health workers in Uganda, Liberia, and Nepal in humanitarian settings impacted by political violence, Ebola, and natural disasters. Health workers were trained in the World Health Organization's mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Health workers demonstrated changes in knowledge (mhGAP knowledge, effect size, d=1.14), stigma (Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes, d=−0.64; Social Distance Scale, d=−0.31), and competence (ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors, ENACT, d=1.68).However, health workers were only competent in 65% of skills. Although the majority were competent in communication skills and empathy, they were not competent in assessing physical and mental health, addressing confidentiality, involving family members in care, and assessing suicide risk. Higher competency was associated with lower stigma (social distance), but competency was not associated with knowledge. To promote competency, we recommend (1) * denotes joint senior authorship

A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Family and Parenting Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes

“…Furthermore, as mounting evidence from HICs shows that common therapeutic factors play a significant role in therapeutic outcome (Lambert and Kleinstauber 2016), competence in these is particularly important to consider when training non-professionals in LMICs. An 18-item tool to measure lay counsellor competence in common factors when delivering interventions in LMICs has been developed and recently evaluated (Kohrt et al 2015;Kohrt et al 2019). For researchers conducting future trials, measurement and reporting of therapist competence and use of common factors through such tools, and direct observations of sessions, would provide valuable information.…”

Traditional and biomedical care pathways for mental well‐being in rural Nepal

“…In the aftermath of the 2015 earthquake of 7.8 magnitude, many high profile mental health projects emerged within rural Nepal only to witness a discrepancy between supply and demand [36]. For example, in 2008 the WHO initiated mhGAP in Nepal [45], and between 2012 and 2019, the UK Aid Direct and Department for International Development sponsored the Programme for Improving Mental Healthcare (PRIME), a project which scaled up mental health services by integrating it with primary care. Unfortunately, integration proved difficult and later analyses of both mhGAP and PRIME revealed that local understandings of mental illness and high levels of stigma precluded community awareness, demand, and access to basic mental health services [46,47].…”

Effectiveness of Group Problem Management Plus (Group-PM+) for adults affected by humanitarian crises in Nepal: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

“…The CPSW training includes an overview of psychosocial concepts, cause and effects of psychosocial issues, basic communication skills, common mental health problems in communities, group facilitation skills, and psychoeducation. Competency is evaluated before and after the CPSW training with a standardized role play assessment tool (ENACT) that has been developed in Nepal and used for non-specialists in humanitarian settings [20].…”