2019
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How (co)evolution alters predator responses to increased mortality: extinction thresholds and hydra effects

Abstract: Citation: Cortez, M. H., and M. Yamamichi. 2019. How (co)evolution alters predator responses to increased mortality: extinction thresholds and hydra effects. Ecology 100(10):Abstract. Population responses to environmental change depend on both the ecological interactions between species and the evolutionary responses of all species. In this study, we explore how evolution in prey, predators, or both species affect the responses of predator populations to a sustained increase in mortality. We use an eco-evoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, not just a single pathogenic bacterium faces a changed environment, but a complex community consisting of many thousands of species (Arumugam et al, 2011;Cho and Blaser, 2012), must adapt to avoid extinction. Whilst many models exist that study how a population of a single species, or a community composed of two species, adapts to environmental change (Hoffmann and Sgrò, 2011;Martin et al, 2013;Northfield and Ives, 2013;Osmond and De Mazancourt, 2013;Cortez and Yamamichi, 2019), fewer models exist that describe the response of an entire community composed of multiple species to an altered environment, although there are some examples (De Mazancourt et al, 2008;Bell, 2017;Lasky, 2019). Furthermore, empirical results, describing community wide adaptation, such as those presented by Bell and Gonzalez (2011), Low-Décarie et al (2015), Bell et al (2019), and Roodgar et al (2019), are clearly calling for such models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, not just a single pathogenic bacterium faces a changed environment, but a complex community consisting of many thousands of species (Arumugam et al, 2011;Cho and Blaser, 2012), must adapt to avoid extinction. Whilst many models exist that study how a population of a single species, or a community composed of two species, adapts to environmental change (Hoffmann and Sgrò, 2011;Martin et al, 2013;Northfield and Ives, 2013;Osmond and De Mazancourt, 2013;Cortez and Yamamichi, 2019), fewer models exist that describe the response of an entire community composed of multiple species to an altered environment, although there are some examples (De Mazancourt et al, 2008;Bell, 2017;Lasky, 2019). Furthermore, empirical results, describing community wide adaptation, such as those presented by Bell and Gonzalez (2011), Low-Décarie et al (2015), Bell et al (2019), and Roodgar et al (2019), are clearly calling for such models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mismatches between responses of, for example, consumer and their resources can lead to the extinction of species that are not directly affected or to a lesser amount by the environmental change, when their resource declines [4143]. Incorporating evolutionary responses in one or more species could impact the probability of survival of a threatened population [44], either through the mechanism of IER as studied here, through effects on coevolution [12,44,45] or changes in selection and demographic changes [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mismatches between responses of for example consumer and their resources can lead to the extinction of species that are not directly affected or to a lesser amount by the environmental change, when their resource declines [4143]. Incorporating evolutionary responses in one or more species could impact the probability survival of a threatened population [44], either through the mechanism of IER as studied her, through effects on coevolution [11,44,45] or changes in selection and demographic changes [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%