2014
DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Close Is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization

Abstract: This paper provides a unique data set on local governance. This dataset measures government decisionmaking at the local level, i.e. the level of government closest to the people. By contrast, the existing literature has focused on decisionmaking at the "sub-national" level. The data set covers 182 countries, and it captures institutional dimensions of political, fiscal and administrative autonomy enjoyed by local governments. These dimensions are then aggregated to develop a "decentralization index" and are th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The same idea is appropriate for the transparency and dependency of LGs on transfers from other government institutions; this is a situation common to many LGs in non-mature municipal bond markets, especially several countries of Africa and Asia, a few areas of Central and Southern America and the Pacific Ocean region, and some former Soviet Union countries [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same idea is appropriate for the transparency and dependency of LGs on transfers from other government institutions; this is a situation common to many LGs in non-mature municipal bond markets, especially several countries of Africa and Asia, a few areas of Central and Southern America and the Pacific Ocean region, and some former Soviet Union countries [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the lack of information on effective fiscal autonomy and the incompleteness of the data, a number of authors have made considerable efforts over the years to put together and make available data sets to improve on the information available from the traditional sources of IMF/GFS and OECD. Among others, Ivanyna and Shah () developed wide raging data sets for a variety of decentralization dimensions including also political and administrative variables but only cross‐section or for few years. Others like Stegarescu () and Baskaran and Feld () have concentrated in collecting time series data on actual tax autonomy building on the information available for OECD countries.…”
Section: Issues To Worry About: Measuring Decentralization and Addresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset, along with a source list, is available upon request. Note that another comprehensive dataset of sub-national indicators has recently been produced by Ivanyna and Shah (2012), but their focus is not on the specific political institutions that we code. expand these datasets by capturing not just the power of national party leaders to nominate candidates for the national legislature, but also whether these national party leaders can nominate candidates to regional and local assemblies.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%