GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2017.8254869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Close Can I Be? - A Comprehensive Analysis of Cellular Interference on ATC Radar

Abstract: Increasing data traffic demands over wireless spectrum have necessitated spectrum sharing and coexistence between heterogeneous systems such as radar and cellular communications systems. In this context, we specifically investigate the co-channel coexistence between an air traffic control (ATC) radar and a wide area cellular communication (comms) system. We present a comprehensive characterization and analysis of interference caused by the comms system on the ATC radar with respect to multiple parameters such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, the variation of overlap probability between two periodic pulse signals is periodic. Moreover, according to Equation (29), the maximum variation of recognition probability ∆P all_ov is equal to 1 b when initial time difference varies in a period, which means that ∆P all_ov can be adjusted through changing the multiples between DME PRF ( f 2 ) and ATCRBS PRF( f 1 ). If the interfering signal is DME RepX, the desired signal is ATC and f 1 is 1996 Hz.…”
Section: Variation Of Recognition Probability Vs Multiples Of Prfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, the variation of overlap probability between two periodic pulse signals is periodic. Moreover, according to Equation (29), the maximum variation of recognition probability ∆P all_ov is equal to 1 b when initial time difference varies in a period, which means that ∆P all_ov can be adjusted through changing the multiples between DME PRF ( f 2 ) and ATCRBS PRF( f 1 ). If the interfering signal is DME RepX, the desired signal is ATC and f 1 is 1996 Hz.…”
Section: Variation Of Recognition Probability Vs Multiples Of Prfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase of electrical and electronic equipment in recent years, analysis of the coexistence between them has gathered great importance. Interference is often analyzed in the frequency domain, power domain, and signal processing, and some researchers have analyzed coexistence between two pieces of equipment operating at close frequency [1][2][3]. Takuya and Shigeru [4] propose an estimation method for the signal environment in ARNS (aeronautical Radio Navigation Service: 960∼1215 MHz) band to examine whether equipment sharing a frequency band interfere with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important since such a characterization will enable the understanding of how the interference at the radar varies with the choice of protection distance and CBSD operating power. A similar analysis of aggregate interference at an air traffic control radar stationed in airports due to downlink transmissions in a coexisting cell-based network is investigated in [11].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7], [9] used ITU-R P.2001 because of delta Bullington diffraction model, and [10], [11] adopted Irregular Terrain Model (ITM). In case of urban area, Extended Hata propagation model are used in [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%