How Close are We to Realizing a Pragmatic VANET Solution? A Meta-Survey

Saini, Mukesh; Alelaiwi, Abdulhameed; Saddik, Abdulmotaleb El

doi:10.1145/2817552

Cited by 104 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 148 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a large variety of surveys [6] that discuss various aspects of cITS security, including authentication schemes, attack techniques, routing security, trust management, and revocation. Compared to these works, we are more focused on misbehavior detection as it relates to real-world processes, and we aim to provide a detailed categorization of existing work.…”

Section: Related Surveys and Contributionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Survey on Misbehavior Detection in Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems

Heijden

Dietzel

Leinmüller

et al. 2019

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

193

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems (cITS) are a promising technology to enhance driving safety and efficiency. Vehicles communicate wirelessly with other vehicles and infrastructure, thereby creating a highly dynamic and heterogeneously managed ad-hoc network. It is these network properties that make it a challenging task to protect integrity of the data and guarantee its correctness. A major component is the problem that traditional security mechanisms like PKIbased asymmetric cryptography only exclude outsider attackers that do not possess key material. However, because attackers can be insiders within the network (i.e., possess valid key material), this approach cannot detect all possible attacks. In this survey, we present misbehavior detection mechanisms that can detect such insider attacks based on attacker behavior and information analysis. In contrast to well-known intrusion detection for classical IT systems, these misbehavior detection mechanisms analyze information semantics to detect attacks, which aligns better with highly application-tailored communication protocols foreseen for cITS. In our survey, we provide an extensive introduction to the cITS ecosystem and discuss shortcomings of PKI-based security. We derive and discuss a classification for misbehavior detection mechanisms, provide an in-depth overview of seminal papers on the topic, and highlight open issues and possible future research trends.

show abstract

Section: Related Surveys and Contributionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems are networks designed to provide a variety of benefits [5], [6]. These include improved road-safety, greener driving through improved traffic management, support for partially autonomous vehicles, and infotainment services such as traffic information services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey on Misbehavior Detection in Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems

Heijden

Dietzel

Leinmüller

et al. 2019

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

193

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It also proposes to provide a secure interface from the outside world to the internal network of the vehicle. The various security and privacy aspects (e.g., performance, scalability, and deployability) of future V2X systems is addressed in the PRESERVE project 9 . PRESERVE was one of the main European projects that experimented with multiple V2X security/privacy solutions and the design and implementation efforts were proposed to the standardization bodies.…”

Section: A V2x Security Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of surveys have been published on various aspects of the vehicular communications in the last decade. In prior work Saini et al [9] provide a meta-survey of existing research for generic VANET (vehicular ad hoc network) domain. There also exists early research discussing application/platforms [177] and communication technologies [178].…”

Section: B Related Surveysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Securing Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication Platforms

Hasan

Mohan

Shimizu

et al. 2020

IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh.

159

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern vehicular wireless technology enables vehicles to exchange information at any time, from any place, to any network -forms the vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication platforms. Despite benefits, V2X applications also face great challenges to security and privacy -a very valid concern since breaches are not uncommon in automotive communication networks and applications. In this survey, we provide an extensive overview of V2X ecosystem. We also review main security/privacy issues, current standardization activities and existing defense mechanisms proposed within the V2X domain. We then identified semantic gaps of existing security solutions and outline possible open issues.We also discuss possible open issues (Section VIII), summarize multiple industry/academic/government initiatives for securing V2X communications (Section IX-A) and compare our work with related surveys (Section IX-B). II. V2X PLATFORM : AN OVERVIEWThis section provides an overview of V2X communication interfaces (Section II-A) and discuss various network/communication models (Section II-B). A. Communication InterfacesThe internal architecture of a vehicle is interconnected with ECUs (electronic control units -embedded computing platform that monitor/control automotive systems) coupled with sensors and actuators. The communication between the vehicle and the outside world such as other vehicles or roadside units (RSUs) is performed via external interfaces (see Fig. 1). These vehicular external interfaces are attached to the telematics control unit (TCU) -also referred to as on-board unit (OBU) 1 -an ECU that provides wireless connectivity [7], [8]. A vehicle control unit coordinates with the OBU to collect and disseminate vehicular data [9]. The current standards for V2X communication are DSRC (dedicated short range communication) [10] in the United States, C-ITS (cooperative intelligent transport systems) [11] in Europe and ITS Connect [12] in Japan. Both DSRC and C-ITS operating in the 5.9 GHz ITS band while ITS Connect operating in 760 MHz band (refer to Section II-B1 for details). An alternative to DSRC/C-ITS is the next generation of cellular wireless mobile telecommunications technology (see Section II-B2). OBUs can also be equipped with interfaces for long-range communication. These long-range wireless channels can be classified as broadcast channels (signals can be broadcast to multiple vehicles without knowledge of the receiver's address) and addressable channels (where messages are sent to vehicles with specific addresses.) [13]. Examples of broadcast channels include the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), traffic message/satellite radio receivers, etc. Addressable channels are typically used for long-range voice/data transmissions and are intended to be used for cellular communications for mobile broadband [8].

show abstract

“…A standard vehicle-to-vehicle double parking protocol has yet to be developed and adopted by the industry. Current communication standards for Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) such as CALM [21] or WAVE [22] should provide support for this. (ii) Perception and Cognition.…”

Section: Open Issues and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

More Effective Use of Urban Space by Autonomous Double Parking

Estepa

Wideberg

et al. 2017

Journal of Advanced Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The new capabilities of autonomous cars can be used to mitigate to a large extent safety concerns and nuisance traditionally associated with double parking. In this paper double parking for autonomous cars is proposed as a new approach to temporarily increase parking capacity in locations in clear need for extra provision when best alternatives cannot be found. The basic requirements, operation, and procedures of the proposed solution are outlined. A curbside parking has been simulated implementing the suggested double parking operation and important advantages have been identified for drivers, the environment, and the city. Double parking can increase over 50% the parking capacity of a given area. Autonomous car owners would (at least) double their probabilities of finding parking compared to traditional drivers, saving cruising time and emissions. However, significant work and technological advances are still needed in order to make this feasible in the near future.

show abstract

How Close are We to Realizing a Pragmatic VANET Solution? A Meta-Survey

Cited by 104 publications

References 148 publications

Survey on Misbehavior Detection in Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems

Survey on Misbehavior Detection in Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems

Securing Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication Platforms

More Effective Use of Urban Space by Autonomous Double Parking

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About