How Can We Model Emotional and Behavioral Dynamics in Collective Decision Making?

Rothe, Jörg

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18050-8_34

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This paper presents various ways of introducing altruism into existing game-theoretic models, focusing both on noncooperative and cooperative game theory. This adds to previous approaches of taking ethics, psychology, emotions, and behavioral dynamics into consideration in collective decision-making (Regenwetter et al 2006;Popova, Regenwetter, and Mattei 2013;Rothe 2019b). The purpose of this paper is to make a case for better integrating altruism into AI systems and AI research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself When Thou Playest: Altruism in Game Theory

Rothe

2021

AAAI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Game theory is typically used to model the interaction among (software) agents in multiagent systems and, therefore, is a key topic at leading AI conferences. Game-theoretic models, however, are often based on the assumption that agents are perfectly rational and narrowly selfish and are interested only in maximizing their own gains, no matter what the costs to the other agents are. This summary paper presents various ways of introducing certain notions of altruism into existing game-theoretic models in both noncooperative and cooperative games, in the hope that simulating altruistic behavior in AI systems will make AI better suit real-world applications—and thus may make the real world a better place.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself When Thou Playest: Altruism in Game Theory

Rothe

2021

AAAI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, relentlessly aiming at one's own advantage and maximizing one's own utility regardless of the consequences for others may in fact not only diminish an agent's individual gains, but it may also harm the society of agents in a multiagent system as a whole. With this in mind, there have been some approaches of taking ethics, psychology, emotions, and behavioral dynamics into consideration in collective decision-making (Regenwetter, Grofman, Marley, & Tsetlin, 2006;Popova, Regenwetter, & Mattei, 2013;Rothe, 2019). This paper integrates altruism into the model of hedonic games.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Altruistic Hedonic Games

Kerkmann¹,

Nguyen²,

Rey³

et al. 2022

jair

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hedonic games are coalition formation games in which players have preferences over the coalitions they can join. For a long time, all models of representing hedonic games were based upon selfish players only. Among the known ways of representing hedonic games compactly, we focus on friend-oriented hedonic games and propose a novel model for them that takes into account not only the players’ own preferences but also their friends’ preferences. Depending on the order in which players look at their own or their friends’ preferences, we distinguish three degrees of altruism: selfish-first, equal-treatment, and altruistic-treatment preferences. We study both the axiomatic properties of these games and the computational complexity of problems related to various common stability concepts.

show abstract

How Can We Model Emotional and Behavioral Dynamics in Collective Decision Making?

Cited by 2 publications

References 27 publications

Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself When Thou Playest: Altruism in Game Theory

Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself When Thou Playest: Altruism in Game Theory

Altruistic Hedonic Games

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About