1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01573.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can we compare graduate and non‐graduate nurses? A review of the literature

Abstract: This paper reviews some of the literature comparing the graduates or 'end-products' of two or more nurse education programmes. The main focus of the paper is how graduate and non-graduate nurses may be compared. Since the amount of literature in this field in the United Kingdom is limited, much of that reviewed is from the USA. The paper demonstrates that there are many problems associated with evaluating the 'end-products' of nurse education programmes, particularly when quantitative approaches are taken. It … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where students undertaking degree level vs diploma level pre‐registration programmes have been compared in terms of their performance at work the results have either been inconsistent or inconclusive. As Bircumshaw (1989) has pointed out the results of such studies are difficult to interpret as entrants to different types of programmes are likely to be different to start with, the educational process in many cases remains a ‘black box’ and while a particular programme may have well‐defined objectives there is no general consensus on appropriate outcome measures or agreement on what makes a ‘good’ nurse let alone how to measure it. Thus, measuring the differential impact of different programmes of preparation or the ‘added value’ of particular types of continuing education on patient care remains an art or science which is still in its infancy ( Fitzpatrick et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where students undertaking degree level vs diploma level pre‐registration programmes have been compared in terms of their performance at work the results have either been inconsistent or inconclusive. As Bircumshaw (1989) has pointed out the results of such studies are difficult to interpret as entrants to different types of programmes are likely to be different to start with, the educational process in many cases remains a ‘black box’ and while a particular programme may have well‐defined objectives there is no general consensus on appropriate outcome measures or agreement on what makes a ‘good’ nurse let alone how to measure it. Thus, measuring the differential impact of different programmes of preparation or the ‘added value’ of particular types of continuing education on patient care remains an art or science which is still in its infancy ( Fitzpatrick et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectations of nurses and their career advancement is not necessarily linked to educational achievement but dependent upon experience (Schank & Stollenwerk 1988, Bircumshaw 1989a). Nevertheless, there has been an expectation that degree students should have a wider knowledge base and capabilities (Reid et al .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the graduate nurse has been determmed to some extent by the abibty of the graduate mdividually and by the percephon of those woriang with the graduate It has been reported that manager seem to adopt one of two posihons m relation to graduate nurses (Bircumsbaw 1989, English National Board 1989 either managers employ graduate nurses m positions similar to those of other tramed nurses, but consider that graduate nurses should funchon differently m terms of research utilization and dehvery of care, or managers believe that graduate nurses should concentrate on research, management and teachmg rather than hands-on care Undergraduate nursmg degrees generally aim to provide a research-based and theoretically sound chmcal nurse Kramer (1981) has suggested that undergraduate nursing prepares graduates to work in five specific roles, the care-giver, the beginnmg manager or leader, the health promoter, the teacher or counsellor and the health screener The results of previous undergraduate nursmg surveys would seem to reinforce this view generally. However, Smdair (1987) reported on Edmburgh's nursmg graduates, using longitudinal data, that few entered senior management posts Attempts to compare graduate and non-graduate nurses have concluded that currently there is msuffiaent documentahon to aUow such an evaluahon to take place (Bircumshaw 1989) It can also be argued that, so far, the limitmg of university nursmg places has meant that a cntical mass of graduate nurses has yet to be establisbed…”
Section: The Role Of the Graduate Nursementioning
confidence: 99%