Radiosurgery 2006
DOI: 10.1159/000093718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Can Tumor Effect and Normal Tissue Effect Be Balanced in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delivery of these high doses using conventional treatment planning comes at the price of increased toxicity [17,18]. Utilizing a highly conformal treatment planning technique such as IMRT or tomotherapy has two aims; increasing the dose to the tumor, and minimizing the dose to surrounding normal tissue by decreasing the volume of normal tissue receiving the prescribed dose as far as possible [12]. However, improvements in tumor localization and set-up reproducibility have to be integral components of these techniques, and become increasingly important as treatment fields decrease in size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Delivery of these high doses using conventional treatment planning comes at the price of increased toxicity [17,18]. Utilizing a highly conformal treatment planning technique such as IMRT or tomotherapy has two aims; increasing the dose to the tumor, and minimizing the dose to surrounding normal tissue by decreasing the volume of normal tissue receiving the prescribed dose as far as possible [12]. However, improvements in tumor localization and set-up reproducibility have to be integral components of these techniques, and become increasingly important as treatment fields decrease in size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment plans were reviewed, and mean normalized total doses (NTD ) were obtained for both the primary tumor and the total lung volume outside the PTV (residual lung) [11]. The plan was optimized so that the ratio of the prescription isodose volume (PIV) to the volume of residual healthy lung remained below the modeled toxicity threshold as published by us previously [12] and hence the residual mean lung NTD was less than 18.5 Gy 3 for all cases. The maximum FED for the avoidance structures was also obtained for each treatment plan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%