2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12304-017-9287-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Can the Study of the Humanities Inform the Study of Biosemiotics?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e characteristics of the mobile Internet are shown in Figure 1. e best time is to achieve industrial upgrading [11].…”
Section: Mobile Internet Is the Mainstreammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e characteristics of the mobile Internet are shown in Figure 1. e best time is to achieve industrial upgrading [11].…”
Section: Mobile Internet Is the Mainstreammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms continually both shape and are shaped by the embodied and enminded semiotic relations which both scaffold matter and energy, and also constitute life and meaning on this planet. Human beings are but a part of that global semiosis in which the biosphere is at the same time the semiosphere” (Favareau et al. , 2017, p. 28).…”
Section: Semiotics In Lis Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the deep significance of the humanities to the study of biosemiotics (Favareau et al 2017), which includes a fundamental interdependence that is reflected in the "evolutionary history of biosemiotics" itself (Favareau 2010), let us take a look at what is common to the transdisciplinary framework of cybersemiotics and to the endeavours of an intercultural semiotic philology of thought forms as sketched above. The latter, with its interest in a comparative appraisal of specific constellations of logic, grammar, ontology, and epistemology resonates well with the reliance of cybersemiotics upon a phenomenologically based semiotic ontology of dynamic forms for solving questions of transdisciplinarity (Brier 2018a).…”
Section: Towards a Cybersemiotic Philology Of Buddhist Knowledge Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 As Bohm (1980) tells us, it is therefore no accident that "significance, meaning, and communication became relevant in the expression of the general descriptive order of physics..." (p. 123). In postclassical physics, self-referential processes have brought about "a rapprochement between thought styles we had come to view as essentially separated, namely, the hermeneutic activities of the humanist and the experimentation-cum-calculation model of the natural scientist" (Wallmannsberger 2003, p. 91): a development that also finds expression in a mutual enrichment between biosemiotics and the humanities (Favareau et al 2017). 68 Within the context of classical physics, the assumption of object constancy alone allowed for a fundamental separation between object and measurement process: the measured values produced by an apparatus were formulated in theoretical language with an explanation in causal terms (cf.…”
Section: The Environment As a Room Of Our Own (Un/making): How To Undo Objects And Concepts In Process-philosophical Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%