How can the results of a qualitative process evaluation be applied in management, improvement and modification of a preventive community trial? The IHHP Study

Abstract

BackgroundThis study reports the results of the qualitative process evaluation (PE) of the Isfahan Healthy Heart Program (IHHP), an integrated community-based trial for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in Iran.MethodsThe study explored the overall quality of program implementation. The participants, including designers of IHHP, stakeholders and community members (n = 60) were purposefully recruited from the intervention areas. Data collected from semi-structured interviews and field notes were analyzed using a modified thematic analysis.ResultsFour main themes were identified. Our findings highlighted the key role of the resources as both facilitating and hindering factors. IHHP directors faced incompatibilities arising from negative perceptions/attitudes which resulted in decreased adherence to the program. Hence various strategies were used to motivate, strengthen and organize the human workforce implementing the program.ConclusionRecommendations arising from evaluation of the program were used in subsequent stages of implementation. Qualitative research is an important component of community trials which can improve their implementation.

Perceptions of illness as predictive factors for perceived stress in patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program

“…Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common disorder worldwide, accounting for 31% of all global deaths (World Health Organization, ), and is one of the leading causes of death, both in developed and developing countries (Pagidipati & Gaziano, ; Sarrafzadegan, Rabiei, Alavi, Abedi, & Zarfeshani, ). Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a valuable and cost‐effective secondary prevention strategy, which has been identified as an essential part of contemporary health care for patients with CVD (Alavi, Irajpour, Giles, Rabiei, & Sarrafzadegan, ).…”

Physicians’ Perspectives of the Factors Influential in Implementing National Clinical Guidelines for Hypertension in Iran: A Qualitative Study

“…The important role of macro-level support has also been emphasized by Lee et al [23] who in their qualitative study reported that existing systems, structures, and policies could not support the implementation of the guideline and are actually important obstacles to its implementation. Another policy-related issue highlighted in other studies is resource allocation [24,25]. Particularly, a reduction in human resources" capacity can result in excessive pressure on physicians and other health team members [26].…”

Integrating the Principles of Evidence Based Medicine and Evidence Based Public Health: Impact on the Quality of Patient Care and Hospital Readmission Rates in Jordan

“…Implementing evidence based programmes could reduce negative perceptions about health programmes and policies while increasing adoption and compliance [ 64 ]. While, evidence based public health is more nuanced and in the past decade has tried to develop and evaluate standards based on research of preventative health programmes and services, to determine which types of prevention programmes are more successful and the translation of such programmes across populations [ 65 ].…”