2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12912-016-0125-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can students contribute? A qualitative study of active student involvement in development of technological learning material for clinical skills training

Abstract: BackgroundPolicy initiatives and an increasing amount of the literature within higher education both call for students to become more involved in creating their own learning. However, there is a lack of studies in undergraduate nursing education that actively involve students in developing such learning material with descriptions of the students’ roles in these interactive processes.MethodExplorative qualitative study, using data from focus group interviews, field notes and student notes. The data has been sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research have documented student-generated video activities with no flipped learning settings primarily in the science and business disciplines. Surveys show different positive impacts (teamwork, communication, satisfaction) of podcasting in engineering (Alpay & Gulati, 2010), information technology (Bolliger & Armier, 2013), and nursing (Haraldseid, Friberg, & Aase, 2016). Likewise, student responses indicated increased perceived learning (Alon and Herath, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research have documented student-generated video activities with no flipped learning settings primarily in the science and business disciplines. Surveys show different positive impacts (teamwork, communication, satisfaction) of podcasting in engineering (Alpay & Gulati, 2010), information technology (Bolliger & Armier, 2013), and nursing (Haraldseid, Friberg, & Aase, 2016). Likewise, student responses indicated increased perceived learning (Alon and Herath, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lecturer has the overall responsibility and should review the resources that are produced (Croft et al, 2013). With adequate control, the new material is often of high quality (Croft et al, 2013, Loch and Lamborn, 2016, Haraldseid et al, 2016. Projects with complete redesign report higher student satisfaction and performance at least as good as in previous editions of the course (Mihans et al, 2008).…”
Section: Student-teacher Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of students designing course material or collaborating in course design are available from several disciplines, for example, educational science (Mihans et al, 2008), engineering (Alpay and Gulati, 2010), mathematics (Croft et al, 2013, Loch andLamborn, 2016), law (Hess, 2008), nursing (Haraldseid et al, 2016), and natural science (Woolmer et al, 2016). From these examples, we extracted four common themes that are expanded in more detail below: inclusion and selection, institutional support, student-teacher relationships, and practical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were practical reasons for choosing this scenario since it were developed using active student involvement in a previous study. [23] The data included seven videos, from seven different groups (ranging from 20 to 33 minutes), totaling 221 minutes.…”
Section: Data Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%