“How can I tell?” Consequences of HIV status disclosure among couples in eastern African communities in the context of an ongoing HIV “test-and-treat” trial

Abstract

People living with HIV/AIDS anticipate HIV-related stigma and fear disclosure to intimate partners. Yet, disclosure is critical to reducing HIV transmission and improving care engagement. This qualitative study characterized HIV disclosure experiences and normative beliefs among couples in communities participating in an HIV test-and-treat trial in Kenya and Uganda (Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health, NCT#01864603). In-depth interviews were conducted with care providers (n = 50), leaders (n = 32) and members (n = 112) of eight communities. Data were analyzed using grounded theoretical approaches and Atlas.ti software. Findings confirmed gender differences in barriers to disclosure: while both men and women feared blame and accusation, women also feared violence and abandonment (“I did not tell my husband because [what if] I tell him and he abandons me at the last moment when I am in labor?”). Positive consequences included partner support for increased care-seeking and adherence (“My husband keeps on reminding me ‘have you taken those drugs?’”) Yet negative consequences included partnership dissolution, blame, and reports of violence (“some men beat their wives just because of that [bringing HIV medications home]”). Among HIV-infected individuals in discordant relationships, men more often reported supportive spouses (“we normally share [HIV-risk-reduction strategies] since I have been infected and she is HIV negative”), than did women (“my husband refused to use condoms and even threatened to marry another wife”). Care providers lent support for HIV-positive women who wanted to engage partners in testing but feared negative consequences: “They engaged the two of us in a session and asked him if we could all test.” Findings demonstrate differing experiences and support needs of women and men living with HIV in eastern Africa, with HIV-positive women in discordant couples particularly vulnerable to negative consequences of disclosure. Efforts to strengthen capacity in health systems for gender-sensitive clinician- or counselor-assisted disclosure should be accelerated within test-and-treat efforts.

Exploring social harms during distribution of HIV self‐testing kits using mixed‐methods approaches in Malawi

“…This presents an important opportunity for HIV prevention [48], but also responsibility to ensure that serodiscordancy is understood, with appropriate follow-up advice and management. We identified significant gaps in awareness and understanding of discordancy, both among couples and for health workers, as also reported from other African countries [49][50][51]. Providing clear messages and the need for "Some people when they know that someone has HIV and have started taking ARVs [Antiretroviral] drugs, they feel that they cannot have sex with that person fearing that they can also get infected.…”

Qualitative research on community experiences in large HIV research trials: what have we learned?

“…An analysis of experiences related to disclosure of HIV status in narratives of people living with HIV (PLHIV) from SEARCH published by Maeri and colleagues 23 revealed that HIV‐related stigma in communities during the study's baseline year was perceived to be high by community members. Many individuals resisted disclosure because of anticipated stigma, and there were stark gender inequities in the negative consequences of disclosure, with women more likely than men to experience violence or abandonment by partners as a result of their disclosure of HIV‐positive status.…”

Depression and ART Initiation Among HIV Serodiscordant Couples in Kenya and Uganda

“…We did not have information on the date of initial HIV diagnosis so we were unable to adjust for length of time living with HIV, which could significantly impact both depressive symptoms and ART initiation. Instead, we used time known to be in a serodiscordant relationship, which may only be an approximate proxy measure given that disclosure is challenging and participants could have delayed disclosing to their partners for a time after diagnosis (49,50). We also did not ascertain history of mental illness and it is unclear if depressive symptoms preceded HIV diagnosis (potentially indicative of longer-term depressive disorder) or if they were a result of recent HIV diagnosis (indicative of adjustment disorder with depressive symptoms).…”