2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-06115-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can community-based (re)engagement initiatives meet the needs of ‘NEET’ young people? Findings from the theory gleaning phase of a realist evaluation in Sweden

Abstract: Objective There has been a lack of systematic and theoretically underpinned evaluations, internationally and in Sweden, of local multi-component initiatives delivered outside public employment services and formal education systems to young people who are not in employment, education or training (‘NEETs’). To bridge this knowledge gap, the objective of this study was to present findings from the theory gleaning phase of a realist evaluation aimed at assessing how Swedish community-based initiati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we also noticed the absence of specific topics that we consider important in light of the European Commission's guidelines and that we expected to find in the literature. There were limited research papers focusing (see Figure 6) on youth cocreation, including community-based service creation, although, for service creation related to more complex target groups, the need for community level and young people as co-producers of the services is proven (Voorberg et al, 2013;Windsor, 2017;Osborne, 2018;Erdogan et al, 2021;Jonsson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we also noticed the absence of specific topics that we consider important in light of the European Commission's guidelines and that we expected to find in the literature. There were limited research papers focusing (see Figure 6) on youth cocreation, including community-based service creation, although, for service creation related to more complex target groups, the need for community level and young people as co-producers of the services is proven (Voorberg et al, 2013;Windsor, 2017;Osborne, 2018;Erdogan et al, 2021;Jonsson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been some questioning of the viewpoint that collaboration is a solution in Swedish social policies [ 54 ]. A possible downside of putting so much faith and belief in collaboration as the solution to a complex health system problem, is that this can close off paths to solutions.…”
Section: Collaborators As Boundary Spannersmentioning
confidence: 99%