eCM 2011
DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v022a16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate? An analysis using a cell tensegrity model

Abstract: A eukaryotic cell attaches and spreads on substrates, whether it is the extracellular matrix naturally produced by the cell itself, or artifi cial materials, such as tissueengineered scaffolds. Attachment and spreading require the cell to apply forces in the nN range to the substrate via adhesion sites, and these forces are balanced by the elastic response of the substrate. This mechanical interaction is one determinant of cell morphology and, ultimately, cell phenotype. In this paper we use a fi nite element … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tensegrity model (Ingber 1993) has been used to investigate the response of contractile cells to substrate elasticity (De Santis et al 2011). This study also identifies the substrate stiffness over which the cell shows the greatest sensitivity to substrate elasticity.…”
Section: Simulations Reveal Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensegrity model (Ingber 1993) has been used to investigate the response of contractile cells to substrate elasticity (De Santis et al 2011). This study also identifies the substrate stiffness over which the cell shows the greatest sensitivity to substrate elasticity.…”
Section: Simulations Reveal Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches neglect the biochemistry of the active apparatus of the cell that generates, supports and responds to mechanical forces. The so-called tensegrity model (Ingber, 1993) has previously been used to simulate cells on elastic substrates (De Santis et al, 2011); however, the tensegrity model requires a predefined cytoskeleton. Furthermore, it has been shown experimentally that the disruption of microtubules results in an increase in the traction force generated by cells (Kolodney and Elson, 1995), contradicting the central assumption of the tensegrity model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individual domains can be of hydrophobic, hydrophilic, positively, or negatively charged nature [49][50][51]. In solution, proteins rotate freely whereas on a surface each protein adopts a certain orientation determining which part of the molecule interacts with the surface and which part is exposed to the bulk solution.…”
Section: Protein Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In solution, proteins rotate freely whereas on a surface each protein adopts a certain orientation determining which part of the molecule interacts with the surface and which part is exposed to the bulk solution. The favored orientation of a protein on the surface is the one that minimize its free energy resulting from attractive coulomb and van-der-Waals interactions, hydrogen bonds, and the entropy gain of solvent molecules [49][50][51]. Therefore, its orientation and conformation will depend on the physico-chemical properties of the substrate surface, determining the accessibility of interaction domains with cell receptors.…”
Section: Protein Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation