2013
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can audiovisual pathways enhance the temporal resolution of time-compressed speech in blind subjects?

Abstract: In blind people, the visual channel cannot assist face-to-face communication via lipreading or visual prosody. Nevertheless, the visual system may enhance the evaluation of auditory information due to its cross-links to (1) the auditory system, (2) supramodal representations, and (3) frontal action-related areas. Apart from feedback or top-down support of, for example, the processing of spatial or phonological representations, experimental data have shown that the visual system can impact auditory perception a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(141 reference statements)
1
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Against the background of our model of ultra-fast speech understanding derived from previous work (Hertrich et al, 2013b), only blind, but not sighted subjects were expected to recruit the central-visual system whereas, by contrast, participants with residual or normal vision should deactivate the visual-system during listening to speech. As concerns SMA, already identified as a “bottleneck” of time-compressed spoken language perception (Vagharchakian et al, 2012), hemodynamic activation was expected (i) to reflect gains in behavioral performance and (ii) to increase with speech rate in high-performing subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Against the background of our model of ultra-fast speech understanding derived from previous work (Hertrich et al, 2013b), only blind, but not sighted subjects were expected to recruit the central-visual system whereas, by contrast, participants with residual or normal vision should deactivate the visual-system during listening to speech. As concerns SMA, already identified as a “bottleneck” of time-compressed spoken language perception (Vagharchakian et al, 2012), hemodynamic activation was expected (i) to reflect gains in behavioral performance and (ii) to increase with speech rate in high-performing subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These findings provide tentative support for a relationship between ultra-fast speech perception and right-hemispheric V1 activation—in case the central-visual system is deprived of modality-specific afferent input. Based on our previous studies, it has been suggested that collaboration of right auditory cortex and ipsilateral primary visual area allows for the implementation of a signal-driven timing mechanism related to syllabic modulation of the speech signal (Dietrich et al, 2013; Hertrich et al, 2013a,b). More specifically, subjects able to recruit the visual cortex during spoken language comprehension appear to install an additional information channel conveying temporal cues on syllable structure to the frontal lobe which then help to trigger phonological encoding processes and, as a consequence, to support verbal working memory operations (Hertrich et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study showed that visual cues sped-up linguistic recognition in both noisy and clear listening conditions. Finally, a review and hypothesis article by Hertrich et al (2013) proposes a brain network explaining how blind individuals, on average, are capable of perceiving auditory speech at a much faster rate compared to individuals with normal vision. Together, these articles will help constrain dynamic and neural-based theories regarding temporal aspects of audiovisual speech perception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%