2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can age and lifestyle variables affect DNA damage, repair capacity and endogenous biomarkers of oxidative stress?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent cross-sectional studies in humans on this topic are equivocal since one study showed an age-related increase in both DNA damage and repair (Soares et al 2015), while another showed an age-related decrease in DNA repair capacity (Løhr et al 2015). Such mixed results emphasise the need for comprehensive longitudinal studies investigating age-related changes in both DNA damage and repair capacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent cross-sectional studies in humans on this topic are equivocal since one study showed an age-related increase in both DNA damage and repair (Soares et al 2015), while another showed an age-related decrease in DNA repair capacity (Løhr et al 2015). Such mixed results emphasise the need for comprehensive longitudinal studies investigating age-related changes in both DNA damage and repair capacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the antioxidant defense is overwhelmed, elevated oxidative stress can cause DNA damage and increase the risk of various cancer types [11]. ROS production, stress responses and therefore genomic stability can be affected by life style factors [12, 13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, if the damage accumulates throughout the entire lifespan, as a by-product of normal cellular processes or a consequence of inefficient repair systems, this could lead to the diseases associated with the elderly [31], [38]. On the other hand, Soares et al [39] highlighted the impact of the lifestyle (diet, environment, lifestyle among others factors of life-stage as physiological and/ or metabolic process) has an important role in the accumulation of oxidative damage or in the OS increase apart from growing older. The F 2 -dihomo-IsoPs have not been used previously as a biomarker of aging; they have been associated mainly with diseases in the elderly, adolescents, and children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%