2019
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can a high-quality genome assembly help plant breeders?

Abstract: The decreasing costs of next-generation sequencing and the improvements in de novo sequence assemblers have made it possible to obtain reference genomes for most eukaryotes, including minor crops such as the blueberry ( Vaccinium corymbosum ). Nevertheless, these genomes are at various levels of completeness and few have been anchored to chromosome scale and/or are haplotype-phased. We highlight the impact of a high-quality genome assembly for plant breeding and ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(17 reference statements)
8
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Markers associated with QTLs explained low-to-moderate portions of the phenotypic variances, which suggest a quantitative nature of these traits. In accordance to this, previous GWAS analyses in blueberry also detected few and scattered associations between SNPs and fruit firmness using dominant gene action models, which also explained a small proportion of the trait variation (Ferrão et al, 2018; Benevenuto et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Markers associated with QTLs explained low-to-moderate portions of the phenotypic variances, which suggest a quantitative nature of these traits. In accordance to this, previous GWAS analyses in blueberry also detected few and scattered associations between SNPs and fruit firmness using dominant gene action models, which also explained a small proportion of the trait variation (Ferrão et al, 2018; Benevenuto et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Library preparation and sequencing were performed by RAPiD Genomics (Gainesville, FL, USA) using a sequence capture approach. Briefly, 6,000 custom-designed biotinylated probes of 120-mer were selected based on the distribution on the ‘Draper’ reference genome (Benevenuto et al, 2019), and previously tested on the parental cultivars. Sequencing of the entire population was carried out in the Illumina HiSeq platform using 150 cycle paired-end runs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypes were pre-corrected for fixed year effects, as detailed in Amadeu et al (2019) and de Bem Oliveira et al (2019). A total of 73,045 SNPs was obtained using sequence capture by Rapid Genomics (Gainesville, FL), after aligning the reads against the high-quality "Draper" genome assembly (Colle et al, 2019) as described in Benevenuto et al (2019). Marker filtering followed these criteria: biallelic, mean coverage > 40, minimum allele frequency > 0.01; maximum missing data = 0.5%; minimum quality = 20.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GBS experiments, the consensus of read clusters at cutting sites could be adopted as a reference in cases where there is no appropriate sequence to use 50 . However, genome assembly is a difficult task when dealing with repetitive regions and polyploids 110 . With the aim of reducing possible biases, we decided not to use de novo approaches, which were previously described as inappropriate for sugarcane GBS data 105 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%