2021
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Bayesian statistics may help answer some of the controversial questions in clinical research on Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the 95% credible interval of the posterior distribution of the parameter estimates is directly interpretable as the range in which the parameter lies with 95% probability given the data. This is different from the interpretation of the frequentist 95% confidence interval: the parameter estimate will lie in this interval in 95% of future repeated experiments 15,17,18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Additionally, the 95% credible interval of the posterior distribution of the parameter estimates is directly interpretable as the range in which the parameter lies with 95% probability given the data. This is different from the interpretation of the frequentist 95% confidence interval: the parameter estimate will lie in this interval in 95% of future repeated experiments 15,17,18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This algorithm is moreover model-free, not making a-priori assumptions about functional dependencies or particular distributions in the variates. The inference principles on which it is based have recently been recommended for the study of Alzheimer's Disease (Temp et al, 2021; see also ASA, 2016ASA, , 2019, and have been successfully demonstrated in a simpler predictor setting (Antoniano-Villalobos et al, 2014). We showed its application in an example of prognosis and treatment of conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease for four different patients, where all three categories of differences listed above appeared.…”
Section: Predictor Importancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Given the small number of cases and the indirect structural imaging approach, we want to point out again that our findings should not be interpreted as confirmatory but that they justify future testing of the hypothesis of a cholinergic deficit in limbic TDP‐43. Finally, our data show the ability of Bayesian analysis to provide quantitative evidence for either the presence or absence of an effect given the data, which is more informative than just accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis of no effect based on classical p ‐values [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%