Abstract:Interpersonal helping behaviors, i.e., voluntarily assisting colleagues for their workplace related problems, have received immense amount of scholarly attention due to their significant impacts on organizational effectiveness. Among several other factors, authoritarian leadership style could influence helping behavior within organizations. Furthermore, this relationship could be mediated by workplace stressor such as rumination, known as a critical psychological health component leading to depressive symptoms… Show more
“…Such perceptions evoke employees to voluntarily exert prosocial behaviors, such as knowledge sharing (Kurtessis et al, 2017). Asim et al (2021) offered an example in which psychological ownership buffers the negative impact of authoritarian leadership on employees' helping behavior via rumination. Similarly, Islam et al (2022) examined the moderated mediating effect of psychological ownership on knowledge hiding.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Psychological Ownershipmentioning
PurposeDrawing on the theories of social capital and leader–member exchange (LMX), the authors examined the moderated mediation relationships of psychological ownership and perceived supervisory support on social capital and organizational knowledge.Design/methodology/approachTo test the proposed model, the authors collected data from 522 employees working in large corporations in South Korea.FindingsThe authors found that (a) social capital was positively related to organizational knowledge sharing, (b) perceived supervisor support mediated the linkage between social capital and knowledge sharing and (c) psychological ownership moderated the indirect effect of social capital on knowledge sharing through perceived supervisor support, such that the indirect effect was stronger for employees with low rather than high psychological ownership.Originality/valueThis study sheds new light on how the nature of relationship between the leader and followers as well as individual's psychological ownership play a crucial role in knowledge sharing.
“…Such perceptions evoke employees to voluntarily exert prosocial behaviors, such as knowledge sharing (Kurtessis et al, 2017). Asim et al (2021) offered an example in which psychological ownership buffers the negative impact of authoritarian leadership on employees' helping behavior via rumination. Similarly, Islam et al (2022) examined the moderated mediating effect of psychological ownership on knowledge hiding.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Psychological Ownershipmentioning
PurposeDrawing on the theories of social capital and leader–member exchange (LMX), the authors examined the moderated mediation relationships of psychological ownership and perceived supervisory support on social capital and organizational knowledge.Design/methodology/approachTo test the proposed model, the authors collected data from 522 employees working in large corporations in South Korea.FindingsThe authors found that (a) social capital was positively related to organizational knowledge sharing, (b) perceived supervisor support mediated the linkage between social capital and knowledge sharing and (c) psychological ownership moderated the indirect effect of social capital on knowledge sharing through perceived supervisor support, such that the indirect effect was stronger for employees with low rather than high psychological ownership.Originality/valueThis study sheds new light on how the nature of relationship between the leader and followers as well as individual's psychological ownership play a crucial role in knowledge sharing.
“…This leadership style is prevalent in collectivist and hierarchical cultures ( Tian and Sanchez, 2017 ) and has both cultural origins and potential for development in China ( Zhang et al, 2018 ). The main characteristics of authoritarian leadership is the emphasis on absolute authority and control of the leader and the absolute obedience of employees, as well as extremely high requirements for employees’ performance ( Farh and Cheng, 2000 ; Jiang et al, 2017 ; Wang and Guan, 2018 ; Asim et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
The complexity of today’s organizational environment increasingly requires leaders to think in a dynamic and flexible way to resolve contradictory issues. This study explored and compared the effects of servant leadership and authoritarian leadership on employees’ work behavior from the perspectives of ambidextrous leadership theory and social exchange theory, and further examined the mediating role of psychological empowerment. In this study, 315 employees from state-owned communication companies in Shandong and Zhejiang Provinces in China were selected as subjects, and path analysis was used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that servant leadership positively predicted organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. While authoritarian leadership negatively predicted organizational citizenship behavior and positively predicted task performance, psychological empowerment mediated the relationship between the two leadership styles and organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Moreover, psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior played a multiple mediating role between the two leadership styles and task performance. The theoretical implications of these findings for advancing the ambidextrous leadership theory in Chinese organizational contexts and practical approaches for corporate managers to effectively use ambidextrous leadership style were discussed.
“…Leadership styles and behaviors are widely acknowledged in shaping employees’ behaviors (Yukl, 2010). Previous literature highlighted the importance of leadership styles on discretionary behaviors (Asim et al , 2021; Islam et al , 2021). For example, positive leadership styles like transformational leadership and appreciative leadership can enhance employees’ discretionary behaviors (Liu and DeFrank, 2013; Asim et al , 2022), but negative leadership styles negatively affect discretionary behaviors such as organizational citizenship behaviors (Zhang and Xie, 2017).…”
Purpose
This study, based on the conservation of resource theory, aims to investigate the negative impacts of abusive supervision on helping behaviors among employees by examining the mediating role of rumination and the moderating role of psychological flexibility.
Design/methodology/approach
A total sample of 282 reliable questionnaires are collected from 282 employees working in education and banking sectors of Pakistan. SPSS and AMOS are used for data analysis of the proposed model.
Findings
The findings reveal that rumination mediates the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ helping behavior. In addition, the results show that higher levels of psychological flexibility negatively moderate the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ helping behaviors through mediation.
Practical implications
This study elucidates how and when abusive supervision deters helping behavior among employees and provides useful guidelines for banking/university’s administration to understand harmful consequences of abusive supervision and take appropriate policy measures to lessen their harmful effects upon employees.
Originality/value
By proposing a moderated mediation model, this study discovers rumination as a key mediator that links abusive supervision to employees’ helping behaviors and identifies the role of psychological flexibility in diminishing the negative impacts of abusive supervision upon employees’ helping behaviors through rumination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.